OpenCode
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if your team lives in the terminal and wants a free, model-agnostic agent with no vendor lock-in.
New check
Comparison
OpenCode and OpenHands both land on Depends.
Buy it if your team lives in the terminal and wants a free, model-agnostic agent with no vendor lock-in.
Buy if you're an engineering team that wants self-hosted, model-agnostic agents and can absorb token costs plus security setup.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Terminal-comfortable developers | Engineering teams automating repo chores |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical founders wanting a polished vendor product | Solo devs who just want editor autocomplete |
| Privacy | One serious 2026 CVE (unauthenticated local server RCE); no public security page on the official site.⁴ | Security program exists (sandboxing, action confirmation, policy integrations), but tracked CVEs . including command injection . matter for a tool that executes code autonomously. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources. | No support-quality evidence found. |
| Public sentiment | Social chatter is largely enthusiastic, with developers actively comparing it against Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex.¹ | Users like that it's fully open source and model-agnostic, but reviews split on results, which depend heavily on the model powering it. |
| Biggest gotcha | CVE-2026-22812 command injection: unauthenticated local server enables remote code execution. Patch fast.⁴ | CVE-2026-33718 (command injection): isolate sandboxes and review every agent action. |