Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM)
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a staffed SOC or threat-intel function and want an open-source, self-hostable platform with strong ratings.
New check
Comparison
Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) and Anomali both land on Depends.
Buy if you run a staffed SOC or threat-intel function and want an open-source, self-hostable platform with strong ratings.
Right fit only if you run a staffed enterprise SOC or CTI program with budget for a sales-led, opaque-priced platform.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | SOC and threat-intel teams | Enterprise SOCs |
| Who it's not for | Small businesses with no dedicated security staff | Small teams needing simple alert triage |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.13 | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No evidence in reviewed sources | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reddit threat-intel communities actively evaluate and debate OpenCTI as a TIP, and G2 reviewers rate Filigran 4.6/5.¹ | No verifiable user reviews surfaced in the sources reviewed. |
| Biggest gotcha | Enterprise pricing is quote-only via private AWS Marketplace offers; no list prices10 | Pricing fully sales-assisted; expect opaque enterprise quotes and negotiation |