Oxc
Worth it
Confidence: Medium
Free and open source, so any JavaScript team can adopt Oxlint at zero cost and near-zero risk, with community claims of 50-100x ESLint speed.
Comparison
Oxc and Biome both land on Worth it.
Free and open source, so any JavaScript team can adopt Oxlint at zero cost and near-zero risk, with community claims of 50-100x ESLint speed.
JS/TS teams wanting one free, fast tool instead of ESLint plus Prettier should adopt it . Ant Design and Astro already do.
| Compare | Oxc | Biome |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Worth it | Worth it |
| Best for | JS/TS repos with slow lint CI | JS/TS web teams |
| Who it's not for | Teams needing stable type-aware linting today | ESLint power users with custom plugin stacks |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁴ | No known CVEs against Biome core; one CVE hit a third-party MCP server, plus tracked npm audit warnings. |
| Support quality | Community GitHub only; no SLA evidence | No support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Community discussion is bullish on Oxlint's speed as an ESLint alternative, while noting type-aware linting and formatter maturity still lag.⁷ | Developers on Reddit and YouTube praise Biome's speed and all-in-one design while debating whether it fully replaces ESLint and Prettier. |
| Biggest gotcha | No paid support; you rely on community GitHub issues12 | Adopting Biome reformats your entire codebase . expect one big review-busting diff. |