Oxc
Worth it
Confidence: Medium
Free and open source, so any JavaScript team can adopt Oxlint at zero cost and near-zero risk, with community claims of 50-100x ESLint speed.
Comparison
Oxc and Prettier both land on Worth it.
Free and open source, so any JavaScript team can adopt Oxlint at zero cost and near-zero risk, with community claims of 50-100x ESLint speed.
If your team writes JavaScript/TypeScript and wants style debates gone, Prettier is the free de facto standard.
| Compare | Oxc | Prettier |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Worth it | Worth it |
| Best for | JS/TS repos with slow lint CI | JS/TS teams tired of style debates |
| Who it's not for | Teams needing stable type-aware linting today | Speed-critical repos . Biome formats far faster |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁴ | Core prettier package unaffected, but two ecosystem plugins (eslint-config-prettier, eslint-plugin-prettier) were compromised via npm in July 2025 (CVE-2025-54313); fixed versions shipped. |
| Support quality | Community GitHub only; no SLA evidence | Community-maintained OSS; no support evidence found. |
| Public sentiment | Community discussion is bullish on Oxlint's speed as an ESLint alternative, while noting type-aware linting and formatter maturity still lag.⁷ | Sentiment favors consistency and ending debates, with recurring complaints about speed, rigid style, and a minority switching to lighter tools. |
| Biggest gotcha | No paid support; you rely on community GitHub issues12 | CVE-2025-54313: eslint-config-prettier hijacked July 2025; only 10.1.6+ is safe . audit lockfiles. |