Comparison

Oxc vs Typescript-eslint

Oxc and Typescript-eslint both land on Worth it.

Oxc

Worth it

Confidence: Medium

Free and open source, so any JavaScript team can adopt Oxlint at zero cost and near-zero risk, with community claims of 50-100x ESLint speed.

Worth it

Confidence: Medium

Buy it if you write TypeScript and use ESLint . it's free, it's the standard, and it replaces deprecated TSLint.

Oxc versus Typescript-eslint
Compare	Oxc	Typescript-eslint
Verdict	Worth it	Worth it
Best for	JS/TS repos with slow lint CI	TypeScript codebases already on ESLint
Who it's not for	Teams needing stable type-aware linting today	JavaScript-only projects . plain ESLint is enough
Privacy	No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.^⁴	Actively maintained with a public security page; sources show one reported vulnerable-dependency bug, no confirmed CVEs.
Support quality	Community GitHub only; no SLA evidence	Community GitHub and Reddit support, no vendor SLA.
Public sentiment	Community discussion is bullish on Oxlint's speed as an ESLint alternative, while noting type-aware linting and formatter maturity still lag.^⁷	Developers treat it as the default TypeScript linting choice, while citing setup effort and performance on large projects.
Biggest gotcha	No paid support; you rely on community GitHub issues¹²	Typed linting can slow big repos; performance issue documented since 2019.