Patrowl
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if your security team wants managed continuous external pentesting plus EASM in one platform and tolerates sales-led pricing.
Comparison
Patrowl and G2 both land on Depends.
Buy if your security team wants managed continuous external pentesting plus EASM in one platform and tolerates sales-led pricing.
Buyers shortlisting B2B software should use G2 free as one input, cross-checked against Capterra or TrustRadius.
| Compare | Patrowl | G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Security teams needing continuous external pentesting | B2B software buyers shortlisting tools |
| Who it's not for | Small teams wanting simple, cheap scheduled scans | Vendors without five-figure budgets |
| Privacy | CVEs exist in the open-source PatrowlManager (CVE-2021-43829, CVE-2026-92753); no public breaches of the commercial SaaS found.⁹ | No public security page found; UpGuard reports no phishing; G2's own DPA references a past data breach. |
| Support quality | Dedicated CSM promised, unverified by reviews | Trustpilot and BBB complaints about G2's service |
| Public sentiment | Users describe Patrowl as a continuous external pentest/EASM platform with SOAR-like orchestration, but independent reviews are very sparse.¹ | Buyers find G2 useful for breadth, but sentiment on G2's own service skews negative on Trustpilot and Redditors weigh it against Capterra and Trustpilot. |
| Biggest gotcha | Pricing is quote-only; expect negotiation and opaque contracts¹ | Vendor contracts are negotiated and opaque; budget five figures annually before committing. |