PhishTank
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Use it if you run a SIEM or SOAR (Splunk, ServiceNow, TheHive) and want a free extra phishing signal for enrichment.
New check
Comparison
PhishTank lands on Depends, and CheckPhish lands on Worth it.
Use it if you run a SIEM or SOAR (Splunk, ServiceNow, TheHive) and want a free extra phishing signal for enrichment.
SOC analysts and security teams buy CheckPhish for fast AI-driven link scanning, domain intel, and Microsoft integrations.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | SOC and threat-intel teams | SOC analysts triaging links |
| Who it's not for | Small businesses wanting end-user phishing protection | Buyers demanding transparent enterprise pricing |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | False-positive removal complaints go unanswered. | No support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Security teams still plug the free feed into Splunk and ServiceNow, but users complain about false positives and slow delisting.⁵ | Reddit and LinkedIn users cite CheckPhish as a free AI scanner for checking suspicious links safely. |
| Biggest gotcha | A false listing can get your domain suspended; delisting is slow and unresponsive.⁶ | Paid plans have no public prices; a sales demo decides your quote |