Comparison

PlanetScale vs Supabase

PlanetScale and Supabase both land on Depends.
planetscale.com
Buy it if your database genuinely outgrows a single node or you need zero-downtime sharded MySQL/Postgres.
Read the full report
supabase.com
Buy if you have developers who want a managed Postgres backend with serious compliance credentials (SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001).
Read the full report
Add this comparison to your site
Put the PlanetScale vs Supabase badge on your site.
Visitors see the independent comparison.
The link points here, and search engines follow it.
This is the badge visitors see on your site.
Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.
PlanetScale versus Supabase| Compare | PlanetScale | Supabase |
|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
|---|
| Best for | Apps outgrowing a single database node | Developer teams wanting Postgres plus auth, APIs, and storage |
|---|
| Who it's not for | Small apps on a single database node | Non-technical teams wanting a no-code database |
|---|
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | Strong on paper: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (with BAA), AES-256 at rest, TLS in transit, regular pen tests. |
|---|
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support evidence reviewed |
|---|
| Public sentiment | Reviewers praise the developer experience and zero-downtime migration tooling, noting it shines mainly at scale. | No independent user reviews were found in the sources reviewed. |
|---|
| Biggest gotcha | $5 entry covers single-node Postgres; sharded Vitess/Neki pricing not shown publicly | Shared responsibility model: misconfigured RLS policies or leaked API keys are your problem, not theirs. |
|---|
Pick PlanetScale when
- Apps outgrowing a single database node
- High-write workloads needing sharded MySQL or Postgres
- Dev teams wanting branch-and-merge schema migrations
When PlanetScale is not a fit
- Small apps on a single database node
- Side projects wanting a free hobby database
- Teams without scale problems . plain managed Postgres is simpler
- Non-technical buyers; this is developer infrastructure
Pick Supabase when
- Developer teams wanting Postgres plus auth, APIs, and storage
- Healthcare apps needing HIPAA-compliant hosting with a BAA
- EU-focused products needing in-region data residency
- GDPR-sensitive deployments needing a formal DPA
When Supabase is not a fit
- Non-technical teams wanting a no-code database
- Small teams unwilling to write and maintain RLS policies
- Buyers expecting the vendor to manage all security end-to-end
- Projects with zero developer resources
Sources
review
review
review
review
review
review
official
official
news
news
news
security
security
official