Postproxy
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're a developer, SaaS builder, or agency wiring multi-platform posting into a product or AI agent.
Comparison
Postproxy and Buffer both land on Depends.
Buy if you're a developer, SaaS builder, or agency wiring multi-platform posting into a product or AI agent.
Buy if you schedule to a handful of channels and want the simplest tool available.
| Compare | Postproxy | Buffer |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | SaaS builders embedding social posting | Creators on 1-8 channels |
| Who it's not for | Solo marketers who just want to schedule posts | Agencies with many client accounts . fees balloon |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | No current vulnerabilities found in sources; Buffer publicly disclosed and resolved a 2013 breach.13 |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No direct support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Public user feedback is thin; most coverage is directory listings, competitor comparisons, and founder posts. | Users consistently praise Buffer's simplicity but grumble that per-channel pricing scales badly. |
| Biggest gotcha | Early-stage vendor (~$1K ARR per Latka). If it shuts down, you rebuild every integration.⁴ | Per-channel fees stack: 12 accounts ≈ $60/month; unlimited-channel rivals undercut this |