Proxyman
Worth it
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're a mobile or web developer who regularly inspects and mocks HTTP(S) traffic and wants a polished, fast Charles alternative.
Comparison
Proxyman and mitmproxy both land on Worth it.
Buy if you're a mobile or web developer who regularly inspects and mocks HTTP(S) traffic and wants a polished, fast Charles alternative.
Essential and free if you debug mobile or web app traffic and are comfortable in a terminal.
| Compare | Proxyman | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Worth it | Worth it |
| Best for | iOS/Android developers debugging APIs | Mobile app API debugging |
| Who it's not for | Non-developers . zero use case without HTTP debugging | Non-technical teams . terminal tool, no polished GUI |
| Privacy | One low-severity 2019 privileged-helper CVE (CVSS 3.7); no recent CVEs listed for current versions; vendor publishes SOC 2 Type II content.⁷ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.13 |
| Support quality | Small bootstrapped team; no support evidence found | No support-quality evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers praise speed and polished UI for iOS debugging; a few report display bugs in recent versions.² | Developers and researchers describe it as their go-to free tool for intercepting app traffic, often preferring it over heavier Burp Suite.16 |
| Biggest gotcha | $99 entry; free mitmproxy or Fluxzy cover basic capture if you're price-sensitive⁴ | Guess: no paid support path; answers depend on volunteer maintainers and community forums.12 |