shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Proxyman vs Requestly

Proxyman and Requestly both land on Worth it.

Proxyman

Worth it
Confidence: Medium

Buy if you're a mobile or web developer who regularly inspects and mocks HTTP(S) traffic and wants a polished, fast Charles alternative.

Proxyman versus Requestly
CompareProxymanRequestly
VerdictWorth itWorth it
Best foriOS/Android developers debugging APIsFrontend devs mocking APIs and headers
Who it's not forNon-developers . zero use case without HTTP debuggingEnterprises needing third-party audited security certifications . sources show only self-published claims
PrivacyOne low-severity 2019 privileged-helper CVE (CVSS 3.7); no recent CVEs listed for current versions; vendor publishes SOC 2 Type II content.⁷No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Support qualitySmall bootstrapped team; no support evidence foundNo support evidence in sources
Public sentimentReviewers praise speed and polished UI for iOS debugging; a few report display bugs in recent versions.²Users praise the interception rules and free tier but openly debate whether the paid version justifies upgrading.
Biggest gotcha$99 entry; free mitmproxy or Fluxzy cover basic capture if you're price-sensitive⁴Exact paid prices aren't visible in public sources . expect to talk to sales for team plans14

Pick Proxyman when

  • iOS/Android developers debugging APIs
  • macOS-first engineering teams
  • QA engineers inspecting network traffic
  • Charles Proxy users wanting a faster UI

When Proxyman is not a fit

  • Non-developers . zero use case without HTTP debugging
  • Open-source-mandated teams (it is closed source)
  • Occasional debuggers . free DevTools and mitmproxy suffice
  • Enterprises needing SLAs from a large, funded vendor

Pick Requestly when

  • Frontend devs mocking APIs and headers
  • QA teams doing in-browser request interception
  • Teams wanting Git-native API collections
  • Postman refugees avoiding pricing

When Requestly is not a fit

  • Enterprises needing third-party audited security certifications . sources show only self-published claims
  • Buyers wanting a proven standalone vendor . now owned by BrowserStack (2025)
  • Teams needing only simple API mocking without interception
  • Guess: shops needing protocols beyond HTTP (gRPC, GraphQL federation)

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. news
  5. news
  6. news
  7. security
  8. official
  9. official
  10. official
  11. review
  12. news
  13. review
  14. review
  15. review
  16. official