Ruttl
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're an agency or freelance designer collecting client feedback on live websites, PDFs, and images . the free tier makes trialing it cheap.
New check
Comparison
Ruttl and Marker.io both land on Depends.
Buy if you're an agency or freelance designer collecting client feedback on live websites, PDFs, and images . the free tier makes trialing it cheap.
Buy if you run client sites or web QA and live in Jira, Trello, or Asana . the feedback-to-ticket flow is strong and users report big time savings.
| Compare | Ruttl | Marker.io |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Web design agencies | Agencies managing many client sites |
| Who it's not for | Large enterprises needing procurement-grade security assurance | Solo devs or 1-3 person teams . Starter caps at 3 users |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.16 |
| Support quality | No support-quality evidence found | No evidence in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | Users call ruttl a fast, game-changing visual feedback tool, though many report hopping between it and rivals like MarkUp and Superflow.⁷ | Users praise fast visual bug capture, AI-assisted reporting, and major time savings, though some reviewers call per-seat pricing steep for small teams. |
| Biggest gotcha | Pro is $18/user/month; costs scale linearly with team size14 | Starter's 3-seat cap means an upsell push as soon as your team or clients grow |