ScreenshotAPI
Depends
Confidence: Low
Low confidence: nearly all public evidence covers the similarly named ScreenshotAPI.net, not screenshotapi.to, which shows no security page and no reviews.
Comparison
ScreenshotAPI and ScreenshotOne both land on Depends.
Low confidence: nearly all public evidence covers the similarly named ScreenshotAPI.net, not screenshotapi.to, which shows no security page and no reviews.
Buy if you're a developer who needs screenshots, PDFs, or videos via API . the free tier makes testing cheap.
| Compare | ScreenshotAPI | ScreenshotOne |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Indie devs adding page captures | Indie developers adding screenshots to apps |
| Who it's not for | Apps capturing logged-in or sensitive pages | Non-technical users wanting point-and-click capture |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | Solo founder, builds in public, offers refunds. |
| Public sentiment | No independent user reviews were found for itself; the review evidence found covers.³ | Reviews are sparse but positive . Trustpilot averages 4 stars and Product Hunt users describe the API as reliable.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | No security page found . risky for authenticated or internal URLs² | Compare per-capture costs first: rivals claim 47-69% cheaper at similar volume.16 |