Selenium
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you have engineers to write and maintain browser test suites at scale . it's the free industry standard.
New check
Comparison
Selenium lands on Depends, and Playwright lands on Worth it.
Buy if you have engineers to write and maintain browser test suites at scale . it's the free industry standard.
Buy if your team writes code: Playwright is free, open source, and repeatedly cited as the default modern E2E testing framework.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | QA teams with coding skills | Dev teams shipping web apps |
| Who it's not for | Teams without engineers . tests are code and break constantly | Teams with zero developers |
| Privacy | Multiple public CVEs, mostly Selenium Grid; a critical flaw in an old Docker hub image and in-the-wild cryptomining abuse of exposed Grids.⁸ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.14 |
| Support quality | Community and sponsorship only; no vendor support | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Users value its free flexibility but consistently flag coding demands, brittle tests, and heavy maintenance.³ | Third-party reviewers consistently describe Playwright as fast, reliable, and increasingly the default E2E framework, though direct user quotes are scarce.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Free tool, expensive operation: you pay for Grid hosting, CI infrastructure, and engineers' time.⁵ | Framework is free, but scaled parallel runs route through Azure's pay-as-you-go Playwright Testing service.16 |