Selenium
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you have engineers to write and maintain browser test suites at scale . it's the free industry standard.
Comparison
Selenium and Puppeteer both land on Depends.
Buy if you have engineers to write and maintain browser test suites at scale . it's the free industry standard.
Buy it (it's free) only if you have JavaScript developers automating Chrome . scraping, screenshots, PDFs, tests.
| Compare | Selenium | Puppeteer |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | QA teams with coding skills | JavaScript dev teams |
| Who it's not for | Teams without engineers . tests are code and break constantly | Non-technical buyers wanting no-code scraping |
| Privacy | Multiple public CVEs, mostly Selenium Grid; a critical flaw in an old Docker hub image and in-the-wild cryptomining abuse of exposed Grids.⁸ | Google-maintained open-source library; Snyk tracks known npm vulnerabilities.15 |
| Support quality | Community and sponsorship only; no vendor support | Community and GitHub issues only; no SLA |
| Public sentiment | Users value its free flexibility but consistently flag coding demands, brittle tests, and heavy maintenance.³ | Developer chatter treats Puppeteer as a staple for Chrome automation, with gripes centered on Chrome-only limits and self-hosting overhead. |
| Biggest gotcha | Free tool, expensive operation: you pay for Grid hosting, CI infrastructure, and engineers' time.⁵ | Publicly exposed Puppeteer-rendering services are a known attack target |