shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Solidworks vs Discourse

Solidworks and Discourse both land on Depends.

Solidworks versus Discourse
CompareSolidworksDiscourse
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forFull-time mechanical and product designersProduct companies needing a public support forum
Who it's not forOccasional users . subscription cost outpaces rare useSmall teams wanting simple chat . use Discord/Slack
PrivacyMultiple 2026 CVEs (desktop RCE, eDrawings buffer overflow, path traversal) plus a reported 2021 breach; patch discipline required.⁸Active security program (HackerOne bounty), but multiple 2026 CVEs including XSS and an auth bypass; patch promptly.
Support qualityNo usable support evidence foundNo direct support evidence found
Public sentimentEngineers praise its depth and industry grip, but many gripe about yearly price hikes and how hostile it is to occasional users.¹G2 reviewers praise ease of use, while some HN commenters are critical; review volume is modest at 68.13
Biggest gotchaUsers report ~25% yearly subscription increases; costs compound every renewal³Outdated self-hosted instances are actively warned about; patch fast or get hit

Pick Solidworks when

  • Full-time mechanical and product designers
  • Engineering teams needing simulation plus PDM
  • Startups via the SOLIDWORKS startup program
  • Hobbyists at the $48 Maker tier

When Solidworks is not a fit

  • Occasional users . subscription cost outpaces rare use
  • Casual makers wanting simple, cheap tools
  • Mac-only teams . desktop CAD is Windows-bound
  • Buyers demanding transparent public pricing

Pick Discourse when

  • Product companies needing a public support forum
  • Open-source projects (free hosting)
  • Large searchable communities replacing mailing lists
  • Self-hosters with DevOps capacity

When Discourse is not a fit

  • Small teams wanting simple chat . use Discord/Slack
  • Budget buyers who won't self-host . hosting is pricey
  • Anyone without admin capacity to patch and moderate
  • Casual communities that don't need forum structure

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. official
  7. official
  8. security
  9. security
  10. security
  11. news
  12. news
  13. review
  14. official
  15. official
  16. official