StackHawk, Inc. vs ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)

StackHawk, Inc. lands on Depends, and ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) lands on Worth it.

StackHawk, Inc.

stackhawk.com

Analyzed September 19, 2026

Depends

Confidence: Medium

Buy if your team ships live web apps or APIs . especially AI-generated code . and wants DAST wired into CI/CD.

Read the full report

ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)

zaproxy.org

Analyzed September 20, 2026

Worth it

Confidence: Medium

ZAP is a no-brainer trial for security-savvy developers and pentesters . it is free and billed as the world's most widely used open-source web app scanner.

Read the full report

Add this comparison to your site

ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) earned a Worth it check in this comparison with StackHawk, Inc..

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent comparison.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Depends StackHawk, Inc. Worth it ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) Independent comparison on Should I Use It

Badge code

<!-- Should I Use It badge. Keep this link. -->
<a href="https://shouldiuse.io/vs/stackhawk/zaproxy" target="_blank" style="display:inline-flex;flex-direction:column;align-items:flex-start;gap:8px;max-width:420px;box-sizing:border-box;padding:14px 16px;border:1px solid #d5dde4;border-radius:14px;background:#ffffff;color:#111111;font-family:Segoe UI,system-ui,sans-serif;line-height:1.25;text-decoration:none;box-shadow:0 8px 20px rgba(17,17,17,0.08);">
  <span style="display:flex;align-items:center;gap:10px;min-width:0;">
    <span style="display:inline-flex;align-items:center;flex:0 0 auto;border-radius:999px;padding:4px 10px;font-size:11px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;line-height:1.3;background:#fef7e0;color:#7a5510;">Depends</span>
    <span style="font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#111111;overflow-wrap:anywhere;">StackHawk, Inc.</span>
  </span>
  <span style="display:flex;align-items:center;gap:10px;min-width:0;">
    <span style="display:inline-flex;align-items:center;flex:0 0 auto;border-radius:999px;padding:4px 10px;font-size:11px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.06em;text-transform:uppercase;line-height:1.3;background:#eef8f0;color:#3b7d42;">Worth it</span>
    <span style="font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#111111;overflow-wrap:anywhere;">ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)</span>
  </span>
  <span style="font-size:12px;font-weight:500;color:#516271;">Independent comparison on Should I Use It</span>
</a>

Text link

<a href="https://shouldiuse.io/vs/stackhawk/zaproxy">StackHawk, Inc. vs ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) on Should I Use It</a>

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

StackHawk, Inc. versus ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)
Compare	StackHawk, Inc.	ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)
Verdict	Depends	Worth it
Best for	Teams shipping AI-generated code	Security-savvy dev teams
Who it's not for	Teams needing only SAST/SCA static code scanning	Teams wanting managed, supported DAST
Privacy	No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.¹⁴	Open-source and auditable; third-party trackers list 2026 CVEs in a ZAP add-on and the stable Docker image.
Support quality	Users call onboarding and support team amazing.	No support evidence found
Public sentiment	Users praise easy integration, developer-friendly workflow, and strong onboarding support.^⁶	Reviewers call ZAP a capable, widely adopted open-source DAST scanner that shines in hands-on manual testing.
Biggest gotcha	Pro listed at ~$42/mo on third-party sites; confirm current pricing and scan limits.^⁸	Third-party trackers report CVE-2026-57301 (CVSS 8.8); keep the tool updated

Pick StackHawk, Inc. when

Teams shipping AI-generated code
CI/CD-native DAST adopters
API-heavy product teams
Startups without dedicated AppSec staff

When StackHawk, Inc. is not a fit

Teams needing only SAST/SCA static code scanning
Projects with no running app or API to scan
Security teams wanting enterprise GRC-style reporting suites
Hobby projects . free OWASP ZAP covers basics

Pick ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) when

Security-savvy dev teams
Manual penetration testers
Startups needing free DAST
AppSec beginners learning testing

When ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) is not a fit

Teams wanting managed, supported DAST
Non-technical buyers without security staff
Orgs needing vendor SLAs or compliance sign-off
Anyone expecting polished commercial UX

Sources

StackHawk . AI Coding Agent Security Platformstackhawk.com
official
StackHawk Pricingstackhawk.com
official
Agentic StackHawk documentationdocs.stackhawk.com
official
Developer-Centric Enterprise DAST with Auto Remediation (AWS Marketplace)aws.amazon.com
official
StackHawk Application Security Testing Reviews & Ratingsgartner.com
review
StackHawk Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Featuresg2.com
review
StackHawk Customer Reviews 2026: API Security Toolssoftwarereviews.com
review
StackHawk Pricing, Reviews & Product Overviewzoftwarehub.com
review
StackHawk: Pricing, Features and Comparisonakto.io
review
The enterprise DAST alternative to ZAPstackhawk.com
official
The Developer-First Alternative to Checkmarxstackhawk.com
official
Application security testing startup StackHawk raises $20.7Msiliconangle.com
news
StackHawk Company Overview, Contact Detailsleadiq.com
news
Product security pagestackhawk.com
security
Getting Started - Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)zaproxy.org
official
Customer - ZAPzaproxy.org
official