Starmapper
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Open source maintainers buy this to see where their stargazers live.
New check
Comparison
Starmapper lands on Depends, and Star History lands on Worth it.
Open source maintainers buy this to see where their stargazers live.
Open source maintainers and DevRel teams get free, fast star charts for any repo.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Open source maintainers | Open source maintainers tracking growth |
| Who it's not for | Enterprises needing SLAs, contracts, or support | Teams judging code quality or security from stars |
| Privacy | Publishes a coordinated disclosure policy and privacy policy, and sets one technical cookie.⁷ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Solo maintainer, no support team. | No support evidence in sources. |
| Public sentiment | Reddit mentions exist but review content is thin, so no substantial user verdicts appear in the sources.⁹ | Developers like the free charts but report breakage when GitHub changes or limits its stars API.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | GitHub cut off public stargazer access. Verify your repo still maps before you rely on it.³ | Fully dependent on GitHub API; rate limits and endpoint changes break charts without warning.14 |