Supervisible
Depends
Confidence: Low
Low confidence: Supervisible looks purpose-built for agency staffing, capacity, and margins, but nearly all evidence is vendor-published.
New check
Comparison
Supervisible and Runn both land on Depends.
Low confidence: Supervisible looks purpose-built for agency staffing, capacity, and margins, but nearly all evidence is vendor-published.
Buy it if you run an agency, consultancy, or dev shop that needs real capacity planning across people and projects.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Agency owners tracking margins | Agencies and digital studios |
| Who it's not for | Solo freelancers . a spreadsheet is enough | Solo freelancers with nobody to schedule |
| Privacy | No public security page found.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No user evidence found | Only vendor marketing; review snippets truncated |
| Public sentiment | The only public user feedback is a single homepage testimonial praising capacity checks; no independent review base was found.¹ | Users praise Runn's ease of use, planning power, and low price, though the public review sample is small.10 |
| Biggest gotcha | No security page . request data-handling details before uploading staff info.² | Pricing is per resource, so costs climb as you add staff. Model your seat math first.15 |