Synology Inc.
Depends
Confidence: High
Buy if you want self-hosted storage, backup, or surveillance and have someone to patch and run it.
New check
Comparison
Synology Inc. and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage both land on Depends.
Buy if you want self-hosted storage, backup, or surveillance and have someone to patch and run it.
Buy it if you're a developer or AI team moving terabytes and want S3 compatibility at a fraction of AWS prices.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | IT-comfortable SMBs self-hosting files and backups | AI/ML teams training on large datasets |
| Who it's not for | Teams wanting zero-maintenance managed cloud storage | Non-technical users wanting simple file sync or sharing |
| Privacy | Active CVE program and published advisories, but internet-exposed Synology NAS units have been recurring ransomware targets.⁵ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; UpGuard shows hardened TLS with no FREAK exposure. |
| Support quality | Community-first; 24/7 premium support costs extra | No evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Enthusiastic owner community and strong ratings, but growing grumbling about upgrade costs, branded drives, and software restrictions.³ | Users consistently praise B2's price, simplicity, and reliability, especially as a backup target.12 |
| Biggest gotcha | Exposed NAS units get brute-forced and ransomware-encrypted; patch DSM CVEs fast, never expose carelessly | 'Fifth of S3 cost' and 'free egress' are vendor claims . validate against your own workload15 |