Textdrop
Depends
Confidence: Low
Confidence is low: textdrop.sh claims zero-knowledge, end-to-end encrypted pastes but has almost no independent reviews, and the site hid behind a browser check.
New check
Comparison
Textdrop lands on Depends, and PrivateBin lands on Worth it.
Confidence is low: textdrop.sh claims zero-knowledge, end-to-end encrypted pastes but has almost no independent reviews, and the site hid behind a browser check.
Buy if you're technical and need free, zero-knowledge sharing of snippets and secrets on infrastructure you control.
| Compare | Textdrop | PrivateBin |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Quick encrypted snippet sharing | Sysadmins sharing passwords and secrets |
| Who it's not for | Teams needing compliance audits or SLAs | Non-technical teams without server admin skills |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | Zero-knowledge design is sound, but 2025-2026 brought several XSS-class CVEs . patch promptly if self-hosting.15 |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | Guess: volunteer project, no support SLA |
| Public sentiment | No reviews of itself surfaced; all public reviews attach to unrelated apps sharing the TextDrop name.⁷ | Self-hosters frequently recommend PrivateBin, though some users are confused by the public instance.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | At least four unrelated apps share the 'TextDrop' name . verify you're on before paying⁶ | You apply security patches yourself; several landed late 2025. |