Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.
tl;dv - AI Meeting Notetaker for Zoom, Google Meet & Teams versus Jamie
Compare
tl;dv - AI Meeting Notetaker for Zoom, Google Meet & Teams
Jamie
Verdict
Skip
Depends
Best for
Teams living on Zoom, Meet, and Teams
Privacy-sensitive teams wanting EU-hosted data
Who it's not for
Anyone recording confidential, HR, legal, or client calls
Anyone wanting a bot to auto-join calls for them
Privacy
Breached Aug 2026: a misconfigured Firebase/Firestore rule exposed 181,874 meetings from 84,312 users; earlier SOC 2 and GDPR claims did not prevent it.³
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Support quality
No usable evidence found
No support evidence found
Public sentiment
Feedback is mixed: roundups praise the free recorder and timestamped catch-ups, but coverage is now dominated by the 2026 data exposure.10
Users and reviewers praise Jamie's transcription accuracy and bot-free capture, while criticism centers on its pricing structure.15
Biggest gotcha
Exposed 181,874 meetings; confirm the flaw is fixed and data remediated before trusting sensitive calls.³
Free plan capped around 10 meetings . confirm the exact limit before relying on it
Pick tl;dv - AI Meeting Notetaker for Zoom, Google Meet & Teams when
Teams living on Zoom, Meet, and Teams
Multilingual teams needing 30+ language support
People catching up on missed meetings fast
Casual calls on the free tier
When tl;dv - AI Meeting Notetaker for Zoom, Google Meet & Teams is not a fit
Anyone recording confidential, HR, legal, or client calls
Government or regulated industries . their calls were exposed
Buyers who need proven, audited security today
Teams who treat SOC 2 badges as proof of safety . this one failed in practice
Pick Jamie when
Privacy-sensitive teams wanting EU-hosted data
People who hate bots joining meetings
Consultants and agencies with back-to-back calls
When Jamie is not a fit
Anyone wanting a bot to auto-join calls for them
Budget buyers . reviewers call the tiered pricing hard to navigate
Large enterprises wanting a proven big vendor (est. $2.4M ARR)
