Vetty
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Solid pick if you screen candidates at volume . staffing, gig, or healthcare hiring . and want fast AI-assisted checks inside ADP and HR stacks.
New check
Comparison
Vetty and Cisive both land on Depends.
Solid pick if you screen candidates at volume . staffing, gig, or healthcare hiring . and want fast AI-assisted checks inside ADP and HR stacks.
Buy if you're a large, regulated employer . healthcare, transportation, staffing . needing high-volume FCRA screening with industry-specific packages.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | High-volume staffing agencies | Large healthcare systems |
| Who it's not for | Teams with a few hires a year . dedicated screening is overkill | Small businesses with occasional hires |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁹ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No direct support evidence in sources | Verification delays and candidate support complaints recur |
| Public sentiment | G2 users praise ease of use, while Reddit recruiting threads show candidate-side frustration during checks.² | Candidate-facing reviews on Reddit and Trustpilot complain about slow checks and verification failures, while aggregator ratings sit around 2.9-3.2/5.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | No public pricing in sources; expect quote-based pricing . confirm per-check costs and volume discounts | Cisive's own post: 65% of nursing programs face unexpected pricing changes |