Wiley
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're an author targeting Wiley journals, a library negotiating open access, or a student whose course mandates WileyPLUS.
New check
Comparison
Wiley and PLOS both land on Depends.
Buy if you're an author targeting Wiley journals, a library negotiating open access, or a student whose course mandates WileyPLUS.
Good fit if your funder mandates open access, your work is sound-but-not-flashy, and you or your library can cover the ~$2,477 APC.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Researchers targeting Wiley's journals | Funder-mandated open access |
| Who it's not for | Anyone evaluating software . this is a publisher, not a tool | Researchers needing fast turnaround . delays recur |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. (Breach stories about 'Wiley Rein' concern a separate law firm, not this publisher.)13 | One past data-breach notification on record; current scans report no threats; no dedicated security page found. |
| Support quality | Self-reported 40% case-resolution gain; author complaints persist | Recurring complaints of long review delays |
| Public sentiment | Students and authors gripe about pricing and subscriptions in reviews, while the strongest praise is self-reported automation gains in the Research Exchange workflow.³ | Researchers on Reddit and ResearchGate repeatedly complain about long PLOS ONE review wait times, while accepting it as a reputable open-access fallback. |
| Biggest gotcha | CPA prep: $780 base plus $480 optional final review; total cost adds up fast⁴ | Published APC figures conflict: $1,931 vs $2,477 . verify the current fee before submitting |