WorkTime
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you need screenshot-free, non-invasive employee monitoring and can confirm the 2025 critical CVEs are patched in your deployment.
New check
Comparison
WorkTime and ActivTrak both land on Depends.
Buy if you need screenshot-free, non-invasive employee monitoring and can confirm the 2025 critical CVEs are patched in your deployment.
Buy if you're a mid-size or larger org with a genuine compliance or visibility need and a transparent rollout plan.
| Compare | WorkTime | ActivTrak |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Employers wanting tracking without screenshots or keystrokes | Mid-size and enterprise remote/hybrid teams |
| Who it's not for | Small teams that just need timesheets or logged hours | Small teams . a shared spreadsheet and trust cost less |
| Privacy | Markets as privacy-first with AES-256 and 'SOC 2-level' claims, but 2025 disclosures include critical auth-bypass and privilege-escalation CVEs.⁵ | SOC 2 compliant; publishes a security statement and responsible disclosure program; no public CVEs found in sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in reviewed sources | Thin support evidence; one negative Trustpilot review |
| Public sentiment | Users rate WorkTime 4.6/5 on G2 and generally praise its non-invasive tracking approach, citing quick performance wins.¹ | Managers on G2 praise the visibility and analytics, while Reddit threads show employees reacting badly to covert deployment.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Verify CVE-2025-15563 (critical authentication bypass) is patched before deployment⁷ | Guess: monitoring consent laws vary by jurisdiction; set a written policy before rollout |