XMPP
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Choose XMPP if you want free, federated, self-hosted messaging and can run and harden a server.
New check
Comparison
XMPP and Snikket both land on Depends.
Choose XMPP if you want free, federated, self-hosted messaging and can run and harden a server.
Privacy-focused teams that already run a server get a free, well-maintained chat tool with encrypted calls.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Privacy-focused self-hosters | Privacy-first teams |
| Who it's not for | Teams wanting Slack-style polished chat out of the box | Teams needing a Slack or Discord clone |
| Privacy | Protocol supports encryption, but real-world risk is misconfigured servers and buggy client implementations. | Public security policy, E2EE by default, fast patch releases. |
| Support quality | Community-run foundation, no vendor SLA | Donation-funded team, community channels only |
| Public sentiment | Users praise XMPP's simplicity and data control but complain about client fragmentation and say rivals like Matrix have overtaken it.⁸ | Self-hosters praise Snikket as an easy XMPP entry point but question it as a full Discord or Slack replacement.⁸ |
| Biggest gotcha | Roughly 50-70 clients exist; none has every feature, and switching between them is messy.⁶ | Hosted instance pricing is not listed in public sources. Ask Snikket before budgeting. |