ZeroGPT
Skip
Confidence: Medium
ZeroGPT is fine as a free curiosity check, but widespread user reports of false positives and unreliable scores make it a poor purchase.
New check
Comparison
ZeroGPT lands on Skip, and GPTZero lands on Depends.
ZeroGPT is fine as a free curiosity check, but widespread user reports of false positives and unreliable scores make it a poor purchase.
Fine as a free spot-check when you're merely curious about a suspicious text.
| Compare | ZeroGPT | GPTZero |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Skip | Depends |
| Best for | Free one-off checks of suspicious text | Teachers casually screening student drafts |
| Who it's not for | High-stakes academic misconduct decisions | High-stakes academic misconduct decisions . false positives documented |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁶ | Public privacy/security pages and student-privacy compliance; no known breaches, but the domain appears in infostealer credential logs. |
| Support quality | Reviewers report poor customer support | 2.2/5 Trustpilot across 139 reviews |
| Public sentiment | User forums and reviews repeatedly call ZeroGPT unreliable, citing false positives and poor support, despite a 4.1/5 G2 rating.¹ | Users split sharply: G2 reviewers find it practical, while Reddit is full of false-positive complaints and skepticism about detection credibility. |
| Biggest gotcha | Marketed as 98% accurate, but independent tests and user reports dispute this⁵ | Never use scores to accuse anyone . false positives on human writing are documented, even by professors15 |