Zushapp
Depends
Confidence: Low
Solo users and small offices drowning in badly named files buy this for the cheap one-time price.
New check
Comparison
Zushapp and SourceForge both land on Depends.
Solo users and small offices drowning in badly named files buy this for the cheap one-time price.
Reasonable as a secondary demand-gen directory for B2B software vendors; expect opaque pricing and lingering trust issues.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Solo users with messy scans and downloads | B2B software vendors wanting extra demand-gen listings |
| Who it's not for | Teams needing SOC 2 or vendor security audits | Teams needing active code hosting and collaboration |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | Checkered history: 2015 breach reset 2M passwords; platform repeatedly abused as a malware delivery vector. |
| Support quality | Solo maker, no support data | No usable evidence |
| Public sentiment | Verified user reviews are essentially absent, and the only Reddit mention is the developer promoting his own tool.¹ | Opinions are split: some longtime users report safe, reliable downloads while others cite the adware history and lingering trust concerns. |
| Biggest gotcha | Free tier caps at 50 AI renames shared across all modes, so heavy users hit the paywall fast.⁶ | Attackers have repeatedly abused the platform to deliver malware |