shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use AntBlazor?

Out-of-the-box mid-stage front/design solution! - antblazor.com

Worth it. Blazor teams that want Ant Design's enterprise admin UI should use it — it is free, comprehensive, and well-regarded. Skip it if you are not building .NET/Blazor apps or need a paid vendor with support SLAs.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources: official docs, NuGet, GitHub advisory, LibHunt, and developer forums. No named corporate customers found.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • .NET teams building enterprise admin apps
  • Ant Design fans moving to Blazor
  • Internal tools and dashboards
  • WebAssembly and server-side Blazor apps

Not for

  • or non-Blazor teams
  • Projects needing paid vendor support or SLA
  • Consumer brand sites wanting a custom look
  • Tiny MVPs where any component library is overkill

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

NuGet package is named 'AntDesign'; 'AntBlazor' packages are prerelease and redirect users to AntDesign

medium

CSS conflicts when mixing with other UI libraries are documented by users

medium

No commercial support; roadmap depends on volunteers and donations

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Comprehensive set of enterprise-class components
  • Free, including commercial use
  • Integrates with existing Core MVC and Razor Pages
  • Supports Blazor WebAssembly
  • Beginner-friendly per new Blazor developers

Cons

  • Community-run; maintainer publicly waiting for funding
  • CSS file conflicts reported with other libraries
  • Confusing package branding: AntBlazor vs AntDesign on NuGet
  • No paid support option; volunteer-maintained only

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/30/2026 - 8 sources - One CI workflow advisory found (GHSL-2024-276); no library runtime CVEs in sources reviewed.

official x2review x4security x1news x1
  • GHSL-2024-276: Actions expression injection, GitHub Security Lab reported an expression injection issue in the ant-design-blazor repository's GitHub Actions deployment workflow, not in the shipped component library.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free for commercial use
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Called out-of-the-box; users find it flexible
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Comprehensive enterprise-class component set
  • Support quality: 2/5. Community-run; maintainer publicly seeking funding
  • Security posture: 3/5. One CI workflow advisory; no library CVEs found
  • Free Price Free for commercial use
  • Yes Free tier Open source component library
  • AntDesign 1.6.2 Latest stable package On NuGet
  • 2020 First releases Nightly builds date to May 2020

Pricing

Open source

Free

  • Full enterprise-class component set
  • Free for commercial use
  • Works with WebAssembly and ASP.NET Core

Security

One CI workflow advisory found (GHSL-2024-276); no library runtime CVEs in sources reviewed.

  • GHSL-2024-276: Actions expression injectionGitHub Security Lab reported an expression injection issue in the ant-design-blazor repository's GitHub Actions deployment workflow, not in the shipped component library.⁷

What users say

Blazor developers praise its comprehensive, flexible component set and frequently weigh it against MudBlazor for new projects.

“AntBlazor has a pretty comprehensive set of components, and fairly act...”
LibHunt comparison page
“Antblazor has been good for me. It has good components and flexible ...”
Reddit, r/Blazor
“I've used Radzen, MudBlazor and AntBlazor for internal applications for ou...”
Reddit, r/Blazor
Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources: official docs, NuGet, GitHub advisory, LibHunt, and developer forums. No named corporate customers found.

Free, comprehensive Ant Design component library for Blazor. Great for .NET enterprise apps; useless outside Blazor.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources: official docs, NuGet, GitHub advisory, LibHunt, and developer forums. No named corporate customers found.

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. official
  7. security
  8. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.