shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use AppSec Santa?

Independent reviews of 226 application security tools — SAST, DAST, SCA, ASPM, API & AI. - appsecsanta.com

Worth it. Use it free as research input when shortlisting AppSec tools — the independence terms and published methodology are real. It is not software: you still pick, trial, and deploy the actual security tools yourself.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 14 public sources; no independent user reviews of the site itself found.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualitySolo site; only a contact email published
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Teams shortlisting SAST, SCA, DAST tools
  • AppSec program builders
  • Buyers wanting vendor-neutral comparisons
  • Researchers citing AppSec benchmarks

Not for

  • Anyone expecting software — it scans nothing and protects nothing
  • Enterprises needing Gartner-grade analyst diligence
  • Teams wanting many community reviewers, not one author's take

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

It's a review site, not software — you'll still buy and deploy real tools separately.

medium

One author's judgment across all 226 tools; review depth varies by category.

medium

Pricing pages are snapshots; bundle discounts of 20–40% are typical but verify with vendors before budgeting.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Reviews 226 tools across 11 categories
  • Publishes methodology including a conflict-of-interest policy
  • Terms ban vendor payments, sponsorships, and free licenses
  • Original research: 534 AI-code samples across six LLMs
  • Open datasets and reproducible scripts published on GitHub

Cons

  • Solo operation; one researcher does all reviews
  • Tool counts drift: 187, 215, 221, 226 across pages
  • Commercial reviews lean on G2/PeerSpot ratings, not hands-on testing
  • No announced funding; long-term operation uncertain

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 12 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. Site terms describe non-intrusive, read-only checks.

official x7review x1news x4

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free content with published methodology
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Category hubs and guides organize the catalog
  • Feature depth: 4/5. 226 tools, original datasets, open scripts
  • Support quality. Solo site; only a contact email published
  • Security posture: 3/5. Read-only checks claimed; no security page published
  • 226 Tools reviewed across 11 categories; counts vary 187–226 by page
  • 2021 Founded Helsinki, Finland; no announced funding
  • 25.1% vuln rate Original research 534 AI-code samples across 6 LLMs
  • No paid listings Independence no vendor payments, sponsorships, or free licenses

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Site terms describe non-intrusive, read-only checks.

What users say

No independent user reviews of the site exist, but security vendors and outlets cite its research.

Full analysis

Based on 14 public sources; no independent user reviews of the site itself found.

Free, solo-run directory reviewing 226 AppSec tools — solid research input, but it's content, not a deployable tool.

Methodology

Based on 14 public sources; no independent user reviews of the site itself found.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. Website Terms Of Useappsecsanta.com
    official
  5. official
  6. review
  7. official
  8. news
  9. news
  10. news
  11. official
  12. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.