shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Review

Depends

Should I use Amazon Web Services (AWS)?

Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use. - aws.amazon.com

· 1 month ago

Buy if you run serious infrastructure at scale and have engineers to manage cost, config, and security. Skip it if you need simple hosting — a managed host or VPS gets you there without bill shock or a DevOps hire.

Confidence

High. Based on 60+ public sources; review evidence mixes employee and customer feedback.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free Tier

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Pay-as-you-goVaries by service
Support plansExtra cost

Best for

  • Enterprise engineering orgs
  • Apps with spiky global traffic
  • Teams with dedicated DevOps/FinOps
  • Compliance-heavy regulated workloads

Not for

  • Small sites and simple apps — massive overkill
  • Non-technical founders with no DevOps staff
  • Anyone needing predictable monthly bills
  • Teams that won't own security configuration

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Managed services create lock-in; migrating off later is slow and expensive

high

One misconfigured S3 bucket can leak everything — you own the config, not AWS

medium

Usage-based billing breeds surprise charges; Reddit threads are full of billing confusion

medium

'Inexpensive' marketing hides five pricing models; cost estimating takes real work

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Pay-as-you-go with no upfront commitment
  • Per-second billing on EC2 cuts waste
  • Runs much of the internet; proven at massive scale
  • Used by 400,000+ companies
  • Broad compliance and security programs

Cons

  • Rated 'Bad' — 1.3/5 on Trustpilot
  • Pricing spans five models; hard to predict
  • Security depends on your configuration, not AWS's
  • Multiple high-profile customer data breaches on record
  • Hacked accounts powered major crypto-mining in 2025

Sources & method

- 10 sources - Mature security organization with CVEs and customer-side breaches on record; shared responsibility means misconfigurations are on you.

official x2review x4security x2news x2
  • CVE-2025-23206: AWS CDK information disclosure flaw, Publicly disclosed information disclosure vulnerability in AWS CDK.
  • Major S3 bucket exposure incidents, Misconfigured S3 buckets have repeatedly exposed data in high-profile breaches.
  • European Commission AWS account breach (2026), Threat researchers documented a breach of an EC AWS account.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Pay-per-use; per-second EC2 billing
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Guess: 200+ services overwhelm newcomers
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Deepest cloud service catalog available
  • Support quality: 2/5. Trustpilot 'Bad' at 1.3/5
  • Security posture: 3/5. Strong program; customer misconfigs cause breaches
  • 1.3/5 Trustpilot rating Rated 'Bad' by customers
  • 14,388 Glassdoor reviews Employee reviews (not product)
  • Yes Free tier Free to join, pay per use
  • 2006 Launched Amazon's cloud arm

Pricing

Free Tier

$0

  • Free to join
  • Pay only for what you use

Pay-as-you-go

Varies by service

  • Per-second EC2 billing
  • No upfront commitments

Support plans

Extra cost

  • Premium support sold separately
  • Tiered plans available

Security

Mature security organization with CVEs and customer-side breaches on record; shared responsibility means misconfigurations are on you.

  • CVE-2025-23206: AWS CDK information disclosure flawPublicly disclosed information disclosure vulnerability in AWS CDK.⁷
  • Major S3 bucket exposure incidentsMisconfigured S3 buckets have repeatedly exposed data in high-profile breaches.
  • European Commission AWS account breach (2026)Threat researchers documented a breach of an EC AWS account.

What users say

Review volume is enormous, but customer sentiment on Trustpilot is poor (1.3/5, 'Bad') while marketplace ratings run higher.

Companies that use it

  • Netflix
  • Apple
  • Blue Origin
  • Reddit
  • European Commission
Full analysis

Based on 60+ public sources; review evidence mixes employee and customer feedback.

Enterprise-grade cloud with unmatched scale — overkill and bill-shock risk for small teams without dedicated DevOps.

Methodology

Based on 60+ public sources; review evidence mixes employee and customer feedback.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. AWS on Trustpilot — rated 'Bad' 1.3/5trustpilot.com
    review
  2. Amazon Web Services Reviews (14,388) — Glassdoorglassdoor.com
    review
  3. Amazon Web Services Review — PCMagpcmag.com
    review
  4. AWS Reviews & Ratings 2026 — Gartner Peer Insightsgartner.com
    review
  5. AWS Support Plan Pricingaws.amazon.com
    official
  6. AWS Securityaws.amazon.com
    official
  7. CVE-2025-23206: AWS CDK Information Disclosure Flawsentinelone.com
    security
  8. High Profile AWS Breaches: Lessons To Be Learned — Snyksnyk.io
    security
  9. AWS alternatives & competitors 2026 — CloudZerocloudzero.com
    news
  10. Companies that use AWS (400,697) — TheirStacktheirstack.com
    news

Add this review to your site

This check for Amazon Web Services (AWS) says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Depends Amazon Web Services (AWS) Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.