Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Depends
Confidence: High
Buy if you run serious infrastructure at scale and have engineers to manage cost, config, and security.
Comparison
Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Vercel both land on Depends.
Buy if you run serious infrastructure at scale and have engineers to manage cost, config, and security.
Buy if you're a Next.js or frontend team that values zero-config deploys and can absorb variable usage bills.
| Compare | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Vercel |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Enterprise engineering orgs | and React teams |
| Who it's not for | Small sites and simple apps . massive overkill | Cost-sensitive teams with spiky traffic . bills get 'crazy' |
| Privacy | Mature security organization with public CVEs and customer-side breaches on record; shared responsibility means misconfigurations are on you.⁷ | SOC 2 Type II certified with published bulletins, but an April 2026 OAuth supply-chain breach exposed environment variables; several CVEs disclosed with mitigations.14 |
| Support quality | Trustpilot 'Bad' at 1.3/5 | No usable evidence in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | Review volume is enormous, but customer sentiment on Trustpilot is poor while marketplace ratings run higher.¹ | Reviews praise speed and deployment workflow, while Reddit threads repeatedly warn about escalating usage-based bills at scale and enterprise-hosting limits. |
| Biggest gotcha | Managed services create lock-in; migrating off later is slow and expensive | Usage-based billing causes surprise invoices at scale; 'crazy bills' commonly reported by Reddit users. |