shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Bacula?

Are you looking for an open source backup software for Linux, Windows or Mac? Take a look at Bacula - advanced enterprise-ready open source backup software. - bacula.org

Depends. Buy the free community edition if you have a dedicated sysadmin and large, mixed-OS backup needs. Skip it if you want simple setup or predictable pricing — Enterprise is quote-only and MSPs call it among the most expensive.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20+ public sources: Reddit, Gartner, TrustRadius, G2, NVD, Exploit-DB, and vendor pages. Quote snippets are truncated at source.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Community Edition

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Enterprise EditionQuote-only

Best for

  • Enterprises with dedicated backup admins
  • Linux-heavy, mixed-OS environments
  • Very large scale backup (VMware, Hyper-V)
  • Teams wanting open source, no license lock-in

Not for

  • Small teams wanting simple, set-and-forget backups
  • Anyone without a dedicated sysadmin to run it
  • Buyers needing published, predictable pricing
  • Click-and-go GUI users; expect heavy config

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Enterprise pricing is quote-only; MSPs rank it among the most expensive backup products

high

Steep learning curve; expect significant time to configure, run, and maintain

medium

Web add-ons (bacula-web, Bacularis) have published SQLi and XSS CVEs

medium

Community edition is DIY; vendor support requires a paid subscription

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free, open source community edition for Linux, Windows, Mac
  • Extremely scalable with a deep, broad backup feature set
  • Stable in production, per independent review
  • Works very well for VMware, per user reviews
  • Support team described as really helpful, fast, knowledgeable

Cons

  • Called one of the most convoluted, overcomplicated backup tools
  • Enterprise called 'probably the most expensive backup software'
  • Ratings trail rivals: 3.9 vs Veritas' 4.5
  • No public pricing; quote-based enterprise sales

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 13 sources - Core engine marketed as security-first (government/military customers), but web add-ons have published CVEs.

official x3review x7security x3
  • CVE-2025-45346, Time-based blind SQL injection; NVD entry published July 29, 2025.
  • CVE-2026-88742, Stored XSS in Bacularis, the web-based Bacula management tool.
  • Bacula-Web SQL injection, SQL injection in Bacula-Web before 8.0.0-rc2.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Free community edition; Enterprise called most expensive
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Users call it convoluted and overcomplicated
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Extremely scalable, deep, broad enterprise feature set
  • Support quality: 4/5. Support team praised as helpful and fast
  • Security posture: 3/5. Enterprise-grade claims, but web-component CVEs exist
  • 3.9/5 Review rating Bacula Systems vs Veritas' 4.5 (rfp.wiki)
  • Not published Starting price Enterprise is quote-only
  • Yes Free tier Open source community edition
  • $5M Funding Raised by Bacula Systems (2011)

Pricing

Community Edition

Free

  • Open source
  • Linux, Windows, Mac
  • Self-supported

Enterprise Edition

Quote-only

  • 5 subscription levels
  • Vendor support
  • Plugins per platform

Security

Core engine marketed as security-first (government/military customers), but web add-ons have published CVEs.

  • CVE-2025-45346Time-based blind SQL injection; NVD entry published July 29, 2025.11
  • CVE-2026-88742Stored XSS in Bacularis, the web-based Bacula management tool.12
  • Bacula-Web SQL injectionSQL injection in Bacula-Web before 8.0.0-rc2.13

What users say

Admins praise scalability and stability but consistently flag complexity, and MSPs call Enterprise pricing the steepest around.

“Bacula is one of the most convoluted/overcomplicat”
Reddit, r/sysadmin
“They are probably the most expensive backup softw”
Reddit, r/msp
“Bacula works very well for Vmware, Bar”
TrustRadius review

Alternatives

Compare Bacula with each alternative.

  • Veeam

    Top-listed commercial alternative; easier, but priced per workload

  • Bareos

    Open source Bacula fork, frequently recommended alongside it

  • BackupPC

    Guess: simpler open source option for smaller setups

    Bacula vs BackupPC

Companies that use it

  • InvestFinansBank
  • itesys
  • Armazem Paraiba
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources: Reddit, Gartner, TrustRadius, G2, NVD, Exploit-DB, and vendor pages. Quote snippets are truncated at source.

Powerful free open-source backup, but complex to run; Enterprise is quote-only and MSPs call it the priciest.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources: Reddit, Gartner, TrustRadius, G2, NVD, Exploit-DB, and vendor pages. Quote snippets are truncated at source.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. official
  9. official
  10. official
  11. security
  12. security
  13. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.