shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Bigstack Review

Depends

Should I use Bigstack?

Open-source VMware alternative (CubeCOS) — hyperconverged private cloud from Taipei - bigstack.co

· 1 month ago

Buy only if you run your own virtualization estate and want an open-source VMware exit; Bigstack sells CubeCOS appliances with quote-based licensing and partner support. Skip it if you need published pricing, plug-and-play simplicity, or guaranteed Western support coverage.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~15 public sources. Software-specific evidence is mostly vendor-published plus one AMD case study; no independent user reviews found. Search results were polluted by unrelated namesakes (Yakima BigStack kayak rack, poker slang, Big Stack Burger).

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing figures published
  • Ease of useNo independent usability evidence found
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo user support reviews found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Cube licensing

Not published — contact sales

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Mid-size IT teams escaping VMware license costs
  • Edge and remote-office infrastructure
  • Healthcare VDI workloads
  • Open-source-first infra teams

Not for

  • Solo devs or small teams wanting one-click cloud VMs
  • Anyone without in-house Linux/KVM admins
  • Buyers demanding transparent, published pricing
  • Teams needing US/EU-guaranteed support SLAs

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Pricing is quote-only; budget stays uncertain until you engage sales

medium

Open-source core versus commercial licensing split — confirm exactly what you're paying for

medium

APAC-centric partner channel; local support quality depends on your distributor

low

Component CVEs appear; you must track their advisory feed

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Open-source codebase with active GitHub org and API repos
  • Explicitly positioned as an open-source VMware alternative
  • Public security response center with published CVE advisories
  • University case study: NYCU runs IC design labs on it
  • Healthcare VDI deployment offered via partners

Cons

  • No public pricing; quote-based licensing only
  • Small Taipei vendor versus VMware and Nutanix incumbents
  • Support in many regions routed through distributors like ICT Distribution

Sources & method

- 13 sources - Maintains a Trust Center and security response program; advisories published for component-level CVEs, including an httpd access-control bypass (Sep 2025).

official x5security x3news x5
  • CVE-2025-23048 — httpd access control bypass, Advisory published on Bigstack's security response page, Sep 30, 2025.
  • CVE-2026-43284, Bigstack security advisory dated Jun 11, 2026; affected component not stated in available snippet.
  • CVE-2026-3195 — qemu-kvm virtio-snd heap buffer overflow, Tracked in third-party vulnerability intelligence; relevant to KVM-based virtualization stacks.

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing figures published
  • Ease of use. No independent usability evidence found
  • Feature depth: 3/5. HCI, VDI, API, dashboard claimed; depth unverified
  • Support quality. No user support reviews found
  • Security posture: 4/5. Public trust center, CVE advisories, GitHub security policy
  • Taipei, Taiwan HQ Per partner case profile
  • CubeCOS 2.4 Flagship product Open-source VMware alternative
  • Yes Open source bigstack-oss GitHub org, active repos
  • None Public pricing Quote-based licensing page only

Pricing

Cube licensing

Not disclosed

  • Licensing options for Cube solutions
  • Compare-and-choose page, no figures

Security

Maintains a Trust Center and security response program; advisories published for component-level CVEs, including an httpd access-control bypass (Sep 2025).

  • CVE-2025-23048 — httpd access control bypassAdvisory published on Bigstack's security response page, Sep 30, 2025.⁷
  • CVE-2026-43284Bigstack security advisory dated Jun 11, 2026; affected component not stated in available snippet.⁸
  • CVE-2026-3195 — qemu-kvm virtio-snd heap buffer overflowTracked in third-party vulnerability intelligence; relevant to KVM-based virtualization stacks.

What users say

No independent user reviews of CubeCOS surfaced; search results were polluted by unrelated namesakes like Yakima's BigStack kayak rack and poker slang.

Alternatives

Compare Bigstack with each alternative.

  • Proxmox VE

    Guess: free open-source virtualization, the simplest VMware exit

  • VMware vSphere

    The incumbent it replaces; benchmark price and maturity against it

  • Nutanix

    Guess: polished commercial HCI at a much higher price point

Companies that use it

  • NYCU (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)⁹
Full analysis

Based on ~15 public sources. Software-specific evidence is mostly vendor-published plus one AMD case study; no independent user reviews found. Search results were polluted by unrelated namesakes (Yakima BigStack kayak rack, poker slang, Big Stack Burger).

Open-source VMware alternative (CubeCOS) from Taipei. Fits skilled infra teams; skip if you want plug-and-play.

Methodology

Based on ~15 public sources. Software-specific evidence is mostly vendor-published plus one AMD case study; no independent user reviews found. Search results were polluted by unrelated namesakes (Yakima BigStack kayak rack, poker slang, Big Stack Burger).

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. CubeCOS 2.4 Release Notedocs.bigstack.co
    official
  5. official
  6. security
  7. security
  8. security
  9. news
  10. news
  11. news
  12. news
  13. news

Add this review to your site

This check for Bigstack says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.