shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Biorxiv Review

Worth it

Should I use Biorxiv?

The preprint server for biology - biorxiv.org

· 1 month ago

Use bioRxiv if you're a life-sciences researcher who wants a free, fast, citable way to release a manuscript before journal review. Skip it if you're in clinical medicine (medRxiv), another field (arXiv), or your target journal or funder disfavors preprints.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources: official pages, news coverage, security reports, and researcher forums. Forum snippets were truncated, so no verbatim quotes included.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence in sources
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Life-sciences researchers pre-publication
  • Labs staking priority claims fast
  • Authors wanting free citable DOIs
  • Text/data miners needing an open API

Not for

  • Clinical/medical research — use medRxiv instead
  • Physics, math, CS authors — arXiv is the fit
  • Anyone needing peer review before release
  • Teams whose target journals penalize preprints

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Site has gone fully offline before (Cloudflare outage); don't bet a deadline on uptime.

medium

No published security page; a public XSS report exists for.org.

medium

A preprint is permanent and public — some contexts (college admissions) count it as a publication.

low

Sustainability rides on grant funding (CZI, openRxiv), not revenue — longevity likely but not guaranteed.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to submit, read, and mine — no fees
  • CZI-funded since 2017; moved to independent nonprofit in 2025
  • Free public API and text/data-mining access
  • Timestamped posting helps establish priority against scooping
  • Now supports public peer reviews and article-level commenting

Cons

  • No peer review at posting — basic screening only
  • Scooping fear persists among some authors
  • Some senior labs and journals remain preprint-wary
  • Critics cite submission friction and restrictive moderation

Sources & method

- 13 sources - No breaches found; one open XSS report on the submission portal and a past Cloudflare outage. No dedicated security page.

official x2review x4security x3news x4
  • XSS on submit.biorxiv.org, Open Bug Bounty lists a reported cross-site scripting vulnerability on the submission portal.
  • Downtime incident, bioRxiv and medRxiv went offline during a Cloudflare outage.
  • No security page, Domain security posture scan found no published security page for.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Completely free, grant-funded; no hidden fees
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence in sources
  • Feature depth: 4/5. API, TDM, commenting, public peer reviews
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. One XSS report, outage history, no security page
  • $0 Cost to submit No submission fee per FAQ
  • Yes Free tier Free reading, DOI, API, TDM access
  • CZI-backed Funding Renewed 2022; now under openRxiv nonprofit
  • 2013 Founded Run by independent nonprofit openRxiv

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Unlimited preprint submissions after basic screening
  • Free reading, DOIs, API and TDM access
  • No submission fee per FAQ

Security

No breaches found; one open XSS report on the submission portal and a past Cloudflare outage.

  • XSS on submit.biorxiv.orgOpen Bug Bounty lists a reported cross-site scripting vulnerability on the submission portal.⁸
  • Downtime incidentbioRxiv and medRxiv went offline during a Cloudflare outage.⁹

No dedicated security page.

  • No security pageDomain security posture scan found no published security page for.10

What users say

Researchers on Reddit and academic forums report broadly positive preprint experiences, with recurring worries about scooping and journal attitudes.

Alternatives

Compare Biorxiv with each alternative.

  • medRxiv

    Sister server built for health and clinical research preprints.

    Biorxiv vs medRxiv

  • arXiv

    Default preprint server for physics, math, and computer science.

    Biorxiv vs arXiv

  • ResearchGate In Review

    Journal-linked preprint alternative with built-in review visibility.

Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources: official pages, news coverage, security reports, and researcher forums. Forum snippets were truncated, so no verbatim quotes included.

Free, CZI-funded preprint server for biology. Essential for life scientists; wrong fit for clinical work or preprint-averse journals.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources: official pages, news coverage, security reports, and researcher forums. Forum snippets were truncated, so no verbatim quotes included.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. bioRxiv FAQbiorxiv.org
    official
  2. Machine access and TDM resourcesbiorxiv.org
    official
  3. bioRxiv (Wikipedia)en.wikipedia.org
    review
  4. BioRxiv preprint server gets funding from CZIscience.org
    news
  5. bioRxiv and medRxiv move to newly formed nonprofitscience.org
    news
  6. bioRxiv begins posting peer reviewsscience.org
    news
  7. Renewed funding for bioRxiv and medRxiv via CZIniso.org
    news
  8. submit.biorxiv.org XSS reportopenbugbounty.org
    security
  9. Cloudflare outage took bioRxiv and medRxiv downlinkedin.com
    security
  10. Biorxiv Domain Securityapis.io
    security
  11. Thoughts on publishing in bioRxiv? (r/labrats)reddit.com
    review
  12. Scooping risk after posting on bioRxivacademia.stackexchange.com
    review
  13. Why think twice before submitting a preprint to bioRxivpandelisperakakis.info
    review

Add this review to your site

Biorxiv earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Worth it Biorxiv Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.