shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Biorxiv?

Free preprint server for the biological sciences - biorxiv.org

Worth it. If you're a life-scientist, post here: it's free, citable, donor-funded, and the field standard for sharing early. Skip it if you need peer-reviewed findings, clinical-grade evidence, or vendor-style support and SLAs.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~35 public sources: official docs, Wikipedia, Science/Nature coverage, forums, and one security disclosure.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Biology researchers sharing results early
  • Labs staking priority before journal submission
  • AI and text-mining researchers needing open corpora

Not for

  • Anyone expecting peer-reviewed, validated findings
  • Clinical decisions — preprints are unvetted
  • Non-life-science fields (use arXiv)
  • Buyers wanting vendor SLAs or support contracts

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Scooping risk: your unpublished findings go public before journal acceptance

medium

One community-disclosed XSS on.org via Open Bug Bounty

medium

No SLA: a Cloudflare issue took bioRxiv and medRxiv offline

low

No dedicated security page found on the domain

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to submit and read; no fees anywhere
  • Nonprofit and CZI-funded, now under an independent nonprofit
  • Preprints get DOIs and citable versions before journal review
  • Free APIs and text/data-mining access at scale
  • Field standard; Nature credits it with changing how biologists share

Cons

  • No peer review — quality is unvetted and varies
  • Scooping worries persist among some authors
  • Site has gone down in Cloudflare-related outages
  • Some labs refuse to post preprints on principle

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/26/2026 - 10 sources - No known breaches; one disclosed XSS on the submission subdomain and brief Cloudflare-related downtime.

official x3review x2security x1news x4
  • XSS on submit.biorxiv.org, A cross-site scripting issue on the submission subdomain was publicly disclosed through Open Bug Bounty.
  • Cloudflare outage downtime, bioRxiv and medRxiv went down together due to a Cloudflare issue; nonprofit infrastructure means no uptime SLA.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free to submit, read, and mine
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Submission guide; basic screening, not full review
  • Feature depth: 4/5. DOIs, versioning, 7 public APIs
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 2/5. Disclosed XSS; outage; no security page
  • $0 Cost to submit No fee, per official FAQ
  • Yes Free for readers All preprints and APIs are free
  • 2013 Launched Operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • CZI-backed Funding Chan Zuckerberg grants; moved to a nonprofit in 2025

Pricing

Free

$0

  • No submission or publication fee
  • Free reading, no paywall
  • Free APIs for text and data mining

Security

No known breaches; one disclosed XSS on the submission subdomain and brief Cloudflare-related downtime.

  • XSS on submit.biorxiv.orgA cross-site scripting issue on the submission subdomain was publicly disclosed through Open Bug Bounty.10
  • Cloudflare outage downtimebioRxiv and medRxiv went down together due to a Cloudflare issue; nonprofit infrastructure means no uptime SLA.

What users say

Researchers on Reddit and ResearchGate report mostly positive preprint experiences, with scooping risk the recurring worry.

“Very interesting finding”
Facebook research group post
Full analysis

Based on ~35 public sources: official docs, Wikipedia, Science/Nature coverage, forums, and one security disclosure.

Free nonprofit preprint server for biology. Essential for researchers; not peer review, so don't treat it as vetted science.

Methodology

Based on ~35 public sources: official docs, Wikipedia, Science/Nature coverage, forums, and one security disclosure.

Sources

  1. bioRxiv FAQbiorxiv.org
    official
  2. bioRxiv submission guidebiorxiv.org
    official
  3. Machine access and TDM resourcesbiorxiv.org
    official
  4. bioRxiv - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    news
  5. bioRxiv and medRxiv move to new nonprofitscience.org
    news
  6. bioRxiv CZI fundingscience.org
    news
  7. How bioRxiv changed biology sharingnature.com
    news
  8. Thoughts on publishing in bioRxiv (r/labrats)reddit.com
    review
  9. Scooping risk after posting preprintsacademia.stackexchange.com
    review
  10. XSS disclosure on submit.biorxiv.orgopenbugbounty.org
    security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.