Biorxiv vs arXiv

Biorxiv and arXiv both land on Worth it.

Biorxiv

Worth it

Confidence: Medium

If you're a life-scientist, post here: it's free, citable, donor-funded, and the field standard for sharing early.

Worth it

Confidence: High

Free, standard infrastructure for physics, math, and CS researchers to publish and read preprints.

Biorxiv versus arXiv
Compare	Biorxiv	arXiv
Verdict	Worth it	Worth it
Best for	Biology researchers sharing results early	Physics, math, CS researchers
Who it's not for	Anyone expecting peer-reviewed, validated findings	Non-STEM researchers . minimal humanities and social science coverage
Privacy	No known breaches; one disclosed XSS on the submission subdomain and brief Cloudflare-related downtime.¹⁰	No known breaches of arXiv itself; documented risks are author-side . secrets leaked in public LaTeX source and prompt injection embedded in hosted papers.
Support quality	No support evidence in sources	Insufficient evidence
Public sentiment	Researchers on Reddit and ResearchGate report mostly positive preprint experiences, with scooping risk the recurring worry.^⁸	Researchers treat arXiv as indispensable infrastructure, while griping about moderation holds, endorsement hurdles, and uneven paper quality.
Biggest gotcha	Scooping risk: your unpublished findings go public before journal acceptance^⁹	LaTeX source is public . studies found researchers leaking secrets and tokens in it