shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Cartegraph?

GIS-powered operations and asset management for public agencies (now part of OpenGov) - cartegraph.com

Depends. Buy if you're a city, county, or utility managing infrastructure assets, work orders, and field crews in GIS at real scale. Skip it if you're a small team or private company — it's built, sold, and priced for public-sector operations.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~50 public sources: review sites, Reddit GIS threads, city procurement records, news, and vendor pages.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo public pricing evidence
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Cities, counties, public works
  • GIS-centric asset management
  • Utilities and infrastructure fleets
  • Parks and forestry divisions

Not for

  • Small teams tracking a handful of assets
  • Private-sector companies — public-sector focus
  • Buyers wanting transparent, self-serve pricing
  • Orgs without GIS data or dedicated admins

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

No published pricing — expect quote-based contracts and council approval cycles

medium

Implementation typically needs paid services; change orders show up in procurement records

medium

GIS integration and data migration add setup work before value appears

low

Owned by OpenGov since 2022 — expect bundling and rebranding

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Deep GIS integration for mapping assets and work orders
  • Field-ready mobile apps on iOS and Android
  • Proven at massive scale — FDNY citywide rollout
  • Reviewers describe the product as intuitive
  • Staff and implementation help get praise

Cons

  • Acquired by OpenGov in 2022 — rebranding and roadmap shifts
  • Pricing only surfaces via sales quotes and council contracts
  • Lukewarm 'decent' verdicts from some GIS practitioners
  • Paid implementations and change orders appear in city procurement records
  • Small water systems told it's overkill; rivals court switchers

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/27/2026 - 13 sources - Published product security page; no vulnerability disclosures found in reviewed sources.

official x2review x7security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No public pricing evidence
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Called intuitive in reviews
  • Feature depth: 5/5. GIS, work orders, mobile, enterprise scale
  • Support quality: 4/5. Staff and implementation help praised
  • Security posture: 4/5. Published security page; no public incidents
  • OpenGov, 2022 Acquired Rebranded OpenGov Enterprise Asset Management
  • 83 Public reviews FeaturedCustomers reviews & case studies
  • iOS + Android Field apps Cartegraph One mobile suite
  • None Public pricing Quote-based; visible only in contracts

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Published product security page; no vulnerability disclosures found in reviewed sources.

What users say

Sentiment skews positive — GIS integration, mobile field tools, and support draw praise — though some GIS practitioners rate it merely decent.

“Generally, I like Carteg”
Reddit, r/gis
“Cartegraph is decent for”
Reddit, r/gis
“Excellent GIS-integrated”
GetApp UK review

Companies that use it

  • FDNY⁹
  • City of Great Falls, MT
  • City of Aurora, IL
  • Town of Marana, AZ
  • City of Arlington, TX

Companies that could

  • City of Temecula, CA Uses Cityworks instead
Full analysis

Based on ~50 public sources: review sites, Reddit GIS threads, city procurement records, news, and vendor pages.

GIS-heavy enterprise asset management for cities and counties — powerful but quote-priced and overkill for small teams.

Methodology

Based on ~50 public sources: review sites, Reddit GIS threads, city procurement records, news, and vendor pages.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. news
  8. news
  9. news
  10. official
  11. security
  12. official
  13. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.