4.x/5
G2 rating
315 reviews on G2
Report
Built to make you extraordinarily productive, agents turn ideas into code. Accelerate development by handing off tasks to Cursor.
Depends
DependsBuy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
Devs love the agents; pricing bites and CVEs are real. Buy for pros, skip for casuals.
4.x/5
G2 rating
315 reviews on G2
1.6/5
Trustpilot rating
322 reviews
$20/mo
Starting price
Pro plan; usage overages extra
$29.3B
Valuation
$2.3B raised; talks at $50B+
2025 pricing backlash; power users report $200+ bills
Non-coders report shipping real projects
Agents, multi-file edits, enterprise admin controls
Refund fights and 1.6/5 Trustpilot
Five CVEs since 2025, including RCE
$0
$20/mo
Varies
Active CVE stream 2025-2026 including remote code execution; patch fast and lock down agent permissions.
Developers broadly praise Cursor's agent productivity and autocomplete, but many turned critical after 2025 pricing changes and quality dips.
Compare Cursor with each alternative.
Native in VS Code; easiest switch if your org already pays Microsoft.
Terminal-based agents; some reviewers switched after Cursor frustrations.
Closest full-IDE rival; G2 compares them head-to-head.
Cursor vs WindsurfFree, open-source agent coding option in 2026 comparisons.
Based on 50+ public sources: G2/Trustpilot reviews, CVE databases, pricing analyses, and funding news.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.