Cursor
Depends
Confidence: High
Buy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
Comparison
Cursor and Devin both land on Depends.
Buy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
Buy if you run a large engineering org drowning in backlog or security debt and can stomach usage-based pricing.
| Compare | Cursor | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Professional developers shipping daily | Large engineering orgs with backlog debt |
| Who it's not for | Casual coders who will hit Pro limits and hate overages | Solo devs and small teams . massive overkill |
| Privacy | Active CVE stream 2025-2026 including remote code execution; patch fast and lock down agent permissions.⁶ | Public prompt-injection and secret-leak research exists (2025); Cognition now ships Security Swarm and a vulnerability remediation program. |
| Support quality | Refund fights and 1.6/5 Trustpilot | No evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Developers broadly praise Cursor's agent productivity and autocomplete, but many turned critical after 2025 pricing changes and quality dips.¹ | Developers praise Devin's code review and speed gains but consistently warn that outputs need close human supervision.¹ |
| Biggest gotcha | Usage pricing is opaque; power users report $200+/month vs the $20 plan | Devin Review consumes ACUs . every automated review adds compute cost, so watch the meter14 |