shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Delve | Media Intelligence for PR and Communications?

Media intelligence platform for PR and comms teams; tracks mentions across news, social, podcasts, and newsletters, then turns coverage into reports. - delve.news

Depends. Fit for in-house PR/comms teams that need multi-channel tracking and AI-drafted pitches — but evidence is thin (low confidence). Skip it if you're a solo founder or tiny team; cheaper monitors or free alerts will do.

Confidence

Low. Based on 3 public sources; evidence is thin and mostly vendor-supplied.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing information published anywhere.
  • Ease of useNo hands-on reviews found.
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo evidence on support.
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • In-house PR teams tracking journalist coverage
  • Comms teams needing multi-channel mention reports
  • Agencies building media lists and pitch drafts

Not for

  • Solo founders doing occasional DIY PR
  • Tiny startups wanting cheap mention alerts
  • Buyers who need security docs before purchase
  • Anyone wanting transparent self-serve pricing

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

No pricing shown — expect a sales call before you learn cost.

medium

No trust or security page — request SOC 2 / data-handling docs before buying.

medium

Guess: journalist lists and coverage history live in-platform; export and migration may hurt.

low

AI-claim metrics are unverified; demand a demo on your own coverage first.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Tracks mentions across news, social, podcasts, and newsletters
  • Turns coverage into reports
  • AI drafts pitches and flags per-journalist coverage gaps
  • Builds media lists and market landscape reports
  • Surfaces message-association metrics to steer spokesperson messaging

Cons

  • No pricing published anywhere on the site
  • No public security page found
  • Headline metrics are self-reported marketing figures
  • No independent user reviews found in public sources

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/25/2026 - 3 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x1security x1

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 3

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing information published anywhere.
  • Ease of use. No hands-on reviews found.
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Multi-channel tracking, AI pitch drafts, media lists, reports.
  • Support quality. No evidence on support.
  • Security posture: 2/5. No public security page found.
  • 4 Coverage channels news, social, podcasts, newsletters

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

No independent user reviews were found; the third-party mention simply repeats the vendor's own description.

Alternatives

Compare Delve | Media Intelligence for PR and Communications with each alternative.

  • Google Alerts

    Free, crude mention alerts for solo founders.

Full analysis

Based on 3 public sources; evidence is thin and mostly vendor-supplied.

AI media monitoring for PR teams — promising pitch tools, but no pricing, no security page, no reviews.

Methodology

Based on 3 public sources; evidence is thin and mostly vendor-supplied.

Sources

  1. Delve | Media Intelligence for PR and Communicationsdelve.news
    official
  2. Security pagedelve.news
    security
  3. Andrew Wyatt (@awhyit) / Xx.com
    review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.