shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Dragonfly Review

Depends

Should I use Dragonfly?

Discover Dragonfly - the most performant in-memory data store, engineered for extreme throughput at scale. - dragonflydb.io

· 1 month ago

Buy if you run heavy Redis-scale workloads and the claimed savings survive your own benchmark. Skip if you need a simple cache or Redis's full ecosystem maturity — plain Redis or Valkey is the safer default.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~12 public sources. High noise: many 'Dragonfly' hits are unrelated products (DragonFly BSD, Alibaba's P2P tool, strollers), so security attribution needs verification.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usable evidence
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo usable evidence
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • High-throughput caches at scale
  • Redis workloads with ballooning costs
  • Large session or event-stream workloads

Not for

  • Small apps — plain Redis or Valkey is simpler
  • Teams relying on niche Redis modules (parity likely partial)
  • Durable, disk-first storage needs — this is in-memory

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

'Up to 80% off Redis' is a marketing ceiling; validate savings against your own workload before switching.

medium

Public review base is thin; support quality and long-term reliability unproven versus Redis.

low

CVEs titled 'Dragonfly' may be DragonFly BSD or Alibaba's P2P tool — verify before treating as DragonflyDB issues.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Markets itself at up to 80% lower cost than Redis
  • Unaffected by the critical Redis RCE found by Wiz Research
  • Public case study: Sharp App cut latency
  • G2 reviewers consistently praise the product

Cons

  • Young, venture-funded vendor (~$24M) against Redis's entrenched ecosystem
  • Multiple recent CVEs reference 'Dragonfly'; attribution to DragonflyDB partly unclear
  • No dedicated public security page found
  • Thin public review base; long-term reliability hard to judge

Sources & method

- 10 sources - Mixed: a few recent CVEs reference 'Dragonfly' (some possibly other products); Wiz's critical Redis RCE did not affect Dragonfly.

official x3review x2security x4news x1
  • CVE-2026-54341 — Dragonfly in-memory store, Listed against 'Dragonfly, an in-memory data store'; details sparse in sources reviewed.
  • CVE-2026-24124 — reported auth bypass, Tagged critical; source titles only 'Dragonfly', so confirm applicability to DragonflyDB.
  • CVE-2025-59346 — SSRF, Dragonfly SSRF fixed in 2.1.0; check your deployed version.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Claims up to 80% below Redis costs
  • Ease of use. No usable evidence
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Guess: Redis-compatible API covers typical cache workloads
  • Support quality. No usable evidence
  • Security posture: 3/5. Few recent CVEs; unaffected by Redis RCE
  • Up to 80% Claimed savings vs Redis Marketing claim on pricing page
  • $24M+ Reported funding Per Startup Intros
  • 2 Pricing plans Per Capterra listing

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Mixed: a few recent CVEs reference 'Dragonfly' (some possibly other products); Wiz's critical Redis RCE did not affect Dragonfly.

  • CVE-2026-54341 — Dragonfly in-memory storeListed against 'Dragonfly, an in-memory data store'; details sparse in sources reviewed.⁷
  • CVE-2026-24124 — reported auth bypassTagged critical; source titles only 'Dragonfly', so confirm applicability to DragonflyDB.⁶
  • CVE-2025-59346 — SSRFDragonfly SSRF fixed in 2.1.0; check your deployed version.⁸

What users say

G2 reviewers consistently praise Dragonfly, but review volume is small and snippets lack quotable detail.

Alternatives

Compare Dragonfly with each alternative.

  • Managed Redis (e.g. ElastiCache)

    Skip ops work; pay for managed Redis instead.

Companies that use it

  • Sharp App³
Full analysis

Based on ~12 public sources. High noise: many 'Dragonfly' hits are unrelated products (DragonFly BSD, Alibaba's P2P tool, strollers), so security attribution needs verification.

Strong Redis-scale replacement with bold cost claims, but young vendor, thin reviews, murky CVE signals. Benchmark it, don't leap.

Methodology

Based on ~12 public sources. High noise: many 'Dragonfly' hits are unrelated products (DragonFly BSD, Alibaba's P2P tool, strollers), so security attribution needs verification.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. official
  4. official
  5. security
  6. security
  7. security
  8. security
  9. news
  10. review

Add this review to your site

This check for Dragonfly says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.