shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Energyinst?

Energy Institute — professional body and publisher of the Statistical Review of World Energy - energyinst.org

Depends. Energy professionals wanting accreditation, training, and networking get real value from membership. Anyone shopping for software should pass — the flagship Statistical Review data is free either way.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~14 public sources; no product reviews or published prices found.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence in sources.
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo evidence in sources.
  • Security posture

Pricing

Personalised (quote-based)

Membership

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Energy professionals seeking chartership
  • Analysts needing free world energy data
  • Energy firms training staff

Not for

  • Software buyers — nothing here to deploy or integrate
  • Teams wanting published prices and self-serve signup
  • Anyone needing a live data API or feed
  • Non-energy small teams

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Membership is quote-based; expect a sales conversation before seeing any price.

medium

Statistical Review ships annually as downloads; plan manual updates each year.

low

Name collision: Energy Institute High School (Houston ISD) pollutes search research.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Statistical Review of World Energy data is free to download
  • Took over the Statistical Review from BP in 2023; now the canonical source
  • Widely cited by Our World in Data, KPMG, and energy media
  • Runs an Energy Academy with structured training courses

Cons

  • Membership pricing is personalised — no published rates to compare
  • It's a professional body, not software — nothing to integrate
  • Annual statistical publication, not a live data feed or API

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/29/2026 - 12 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x2security x2news x4

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Personalised (quote-based)

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Flagship data free; membership pricing opaque.
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence in sources.
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Publications, academy courses, charting tool — moderate.
  • Support quality. No evidence in sources.
  • Security posture: 4/5. 87/100 trust score; publishes a security page.
  • 87/100 URL trust score GridinSoft scan
  • Free Statistical Review data Downloads and archive
  • Quote-based Membership pricing Not published
  • Since 2023 Statistical Review custodian Transferred from BP

Pricing

Membership

Personalised (quote-based)

  • Accreditation
  • Training and events
  • Networking

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

The Statistical Review is widely cited by analysts and Reddit energy threads, but no substantial reviews of membership exist.

Companies that use it

  • KPMG12
  • Our World in Data11
  • Baker Institute (Rice University)
  • M&G Investments
Full analysis

Based on ~14 public sources; no product reviews or published prices found.

Free world-energy data worth grabbing; membership is quote-priced and only for energy professionals.

Methodology

Based on ~14 public sources; no product reviews or published prices found.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. Membershipenergyinst.org
    official
  4. news
  5. news
  6. security
  7. security
  8. official
  9. review
  10. review
  11. news
  12. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.