3.6/5
Evolve rating
135 reviews via rfp.wiki
Report
Depends
Dependserwin fits large enterprises with complex data estates, dedicated data architects, and procurement budget.
Enterprise data modeling/governance suite for big orgs with architects; overkill and quote-priced for small cloud-first teams.
3.6/5
Evolve rating
135 reviews via rfp.wiki
~$2,000+
Entry-level price
G2 comparison listing; quote-based
0 reviews
G2 main listing
erwin product page unrated
Quest Software
Ownership
Acquired January 2021
Quote-based pricing, ~$2k+ entry
Legacy desktop UI; engineers question relevance
Full modeling, catalog, governance suite
Required Mart patches; validator CVE history
No known breach of erwin itself, but Quest ships regular patches for Mart server vulnerabilities and CVE history exists on related components.
Public feedback is thin and mixed: enterprises still rely on it while data engineers debate whether it remains relevant.
“It's not as full-feature”
Compare erwin (by Quest Software) with each alternative.
Modern cloud-native modeling; easier for distributed teams.
erwin (by Quest Software) vs SqlDBMLightweight desktop modeler with friendlier pricing.
Direct enterprise rival with comparable depth.
erwin (by Quest Software) vs ER/StudioAlternative for the enterprise architecture (Evolve) use case.
Based on ~20 usable public sources; many 'Erwin' results (hotel, boots, VW erWin, town of Erwin TN) excluded as unrelated brands.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.