shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Figma Review

Depends

Should I use Figma?

Figma is the canvas where design, code, and AI come together. From first idea to shipped product — go from concept to production with your whole team, in one place. - figma.com

· 1 month ago

Buy it if you are a product or design team building user interfaces together every week — it is the category standard and the free tier is genuinely usable. Skip it if you only occasionally mock up a screen or your developers will all need paid Dev Mode seats; Penpot or a simple wireframing tool will do the job for far less money and pain.

Confidence

High. Based on 30+ public sources including G2, Trustpilot, Reddit, Figma's own forum and pricing pages, NVD/SentinelOne security databases, and funding news.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNot disclosed
  • Ease of useNot disclosed
  • Feature depthNot disclosed
  • Support qualityNot disclosed
  • Security postureNot disclosed

Pricing

Free

Free Starter plan for one team and one project; paid plans are per-seat, with Professional around $16/editor/month and Enterprise seats up to roughly $90/editor/month, plus cheaper Dev Mode seats around $35/month and collaborator seats around $5/month. Seat-based pricing is the most common user complaint.

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Professional~$16/editor/month
Enterprise~$90/editor/month (full seat), ~$35/month (Dev seat), ~$5/month (collaborator seat)

Best for

  • Product and UX teams shipping software who design together daily
  • Design systems teams maintaining shared component libraries
  • Startups through enterprises that want designers and developers on one canvas
  • Teams that want the de facto industry tool with the largest community and plugin ecosystem

Not for

  • Solo freelancers or small teams that only need occasional simple mockups — a paid seat plan here is overkill; Penpot, Balsamiq, or even a template will do
  • Non-design teams (marketing, ops) that just want a whiteboard — Miro or Google Slides is the right-sized tool
  • Budget-sensitive orgs planning to put many engineers on it — Dev Mode seat pricing drew open revolt from users, so the bill scales badly with dev headcount
  • Buyers who need offline or self-hosted control of design data — Figma is cloud-first, and offline-first alternatives exist for that reason
  • A small team that needs one or two landing page mockups a quarter — the free Starter plan or a wireframing tool covers that without seat gymnastics
  • An org where no one will invest in maintaining design files and components — you will pay for collaboration depth you never use
  • Teams that want Figma as a general whiteboard or docs tool — it is a design platform, and cheaper whiteboarding tools fit that job better

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Seat-type sprawl is the big trap: full editor seats, Dev Mode seats, and cheap collaborator seats (around $5/month) mean your real cost depends on who touches files — model this before committing

high

Dev Mode seat pricing drew sustained user backlash, so assume dev-seat costs are a sore point that may keep changing

medium

Billing practices have been called unclear by users in Figma's own forum, with 1-star Trustpilot reviews citing misleading pricing — audit your invoice against seats actually in use

medium

Guess: lock-in is real — once your design system and component libraries live in Figma, migrating to an alternative like Penpot is significant rework, and Figma keeps adding adjacent products that deepen that gravity

low

Some enterprise controls (governance, added security) sit behind a paid add-on rather than being included

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Real-time collaboration is the feature users consistently praise across review platforms
  • Strong aggregate ratings — 4.6 stars across 2,000+ G2 reviews of Figma products
  • Users report it meaningfully speeds up layout work versus older tools
  • Mature, well-funded vendor — $749M raised and a $12.5B valuation — so low risk of the product disappearing
  • Enterprise-grade compliance signals including SOC 2 Type 2 and SSO on the official security pages

Cons

  • Pricing is widely criticized as expensive, topping out near $90/editor/month on Enterprise
  • The separate Dev Mode seat tier for developers was added on top of existing plans and users called it unacceptable
  • Users report unclear billing practices, and Trustpilot reviews flag misleading pricing
  • The AI push is seen as superficial and underwhelming — Figma AI 'is only for superficial design' and Figma Make left experienced users unimpressed
  • Users coming from Adobe tools report friction with different keyboard shortcuts

Sources & method

- 15 sources - Figma advertises SOC 2 Type 2, SSO, and a trust center, but 2025 was rough: Figma's own Data Processing Addendum discloses a security breach caused by a command injection, a command-injection CVE exists in Figma Desktop for Windows, and two RCE vulnerabilities were found in the third-party Framelink Figma MCP server that many teams connect to Figma. A Slack preview exposure issue also let unauthorized viewers see project thumbnails.

official x3review x7security x4news x1
  • CVE-2025-56803 — command injection in Figma Desktop for Windows (v125.6.5), A command injection vulnerability in the Windows desktop app; SentinelOne describes it as a command injection issue and coverage says it could let hackers control developer machines.
  • Disclosed 2025 breach via command injection, Figma's own Data Processing Addendum acknowledges Figma experienced a security breach in 2025 due to a command injection.
  • CVE-2025-53967 — RCE in Framelink Figma MCP Server, A remote code execution flaw in the popular third-party MCP server used to connect Figma to AI agents; security coverage warns Figma MCP servers open orgs to agentic AI compromise.
  • CVE-2025-15061 — second RCE flaw in Framelink Figma MCP Server, Another remote code execution flaw in the Framelink Figma MCP Server, tracked in the SentinelOne vulnerability database.
  • Slack previews exposed full project thumbnails to unauthorized viewers, A design behavior where Slack preview thumbnails revealed project contents to users without access.

Key stats

  • Not rated

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 15

    Sources

  • Analyzed

Pricing

Starter

Free

Professional

~$16/editor/month

Enterprise

~$90/editor/month (full seat), ~$35/month (Dev seat), ~$5/month (collaborator seat)

Free Starter plan for one team and one project; paid plans are per-seat, with Professional around $16/editor/month and Enterprise seats up to roughly $90/editor/month, plus cheaper Dev Mode seats around $35/month and collaborator seats around $5/month. Seat-based pricing is the most common user complaint.

Security

Figma advertises SOC 2 Type 2, SSO, and a trust center, but 2025 was rough: Figma's own Data Processing Addendum discloses a security breach caused by a command injection, a command-injection CVE exists in Figma Desktop for Windows, and two RCE vulnerabilities were found in the third-party Framelink Figma MCP server that many teams connect to Figma.

  • CVE-2025-56803 — command injection in Figma Desktop for Windows (v125.6.5)A command injection vulnerability in the Windows desktop app; SentinelOne describes it as a command injection issue and coverage says it could let hackers control developer machines.⁹
  • Disclosed 2025 breach via command injectionFigma's own Data Processing Addendum acknowledges Figma experienced a security breach in 2025 due to a command injection.10

A Slack preview exposure issue also let unauthorized viewers see project thumbnails.

  • CVE-2025-53967 — RCE in Framelink Figma MCP ServerA remote code execution flaw in the popular third-party MCP server used to connect Figma to AI agents; security coverage warns Figma MCP servers open orgs to agentic AI compromise.11
  • CVE-2025-15061 — second RCE flaw in Framelink Figma MCP ServerAnother remote code execution flaw in the Framelink Figma MCP Server, tracked in the SentinelOne vulnerability database.
  • Slack previews exposed full project thumbnails to unauthorized viewersA design behavior where Slack preview thumbnails revealed project contents to users without access.12

What users say

Aggregate sentiment is strongly positive on the core product — 4.6 stars on G2 with real-time collaboration as the standout strength and users saying it speeds up layout work significantly.

The negativity clusters around pricing (seat model, Dev Mode fees, billing clarity) and around the newer AI features, which practitioners call superficial or unimpressive for real implementation work.

“Figma Make, is brilliant for conceptualising functionality.”
Reddit, r/UXDesign
“I've played around with Figma make, but wasn't super impressed.”
Reddit, r/FigmaDesign
“Figma's payment structure is absolutely ridiculous”
Reddit, r/FigmaDesign
“New Dev Mode seat pricing is unacceptable, what do we do now?”
Figma Community Forum

Alternatives

Compare Figma with each alternative.

  • Penpot

    Open-source, self-hostable Figma alternative that Redditors call the best of the bunch — right answer if seat pricing or data control is why you are hesitating.

    Figma vs Penpot
  • Balsamiq

    Dead-simple low-fidelity wireframing — enough for non-designers sketching screens without a seat-based platform.

    Figma vs Balsamiq
  • Visily

    AI-assisted mockups aimed at people who are not designers — covers the occasional-mockup use case cheaply.

    Figma vs Visily
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources including G2, Trustpilot, Reddit, Figma's own forum and pricing pages, NVD/SentinelOne security databases, and funding news.

Free Starter plan for one team and one project; paid plans are per-seat, with Professional around $16/editor/month and Enterprise seats up to roughly $90/editor/month, plus cheaper Dev Mode seats around $35/month and collaborator seats around $5/month. Seat-based pricing is the most common user complaint.

More gotchas

  • Some enterprise controls (governance, added security) sit behind a paid add-on rather than being included

More not for

  • A small team that needs one or two landing page mockups a quarter — the free Starter plan or a wireframing tool covers that without seat gymnastics
  • An org where no one will invest in maintaining design files and components — you will pay for collaboration depth you never use
  • Teams that want Figma as a general whiteboard or docs tool — it is a design platform, and cheaper whiteboarding tools fit that job better

More quotes

  • New Dev Mode seat pricing is unacceptable, what do we do now?

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources including G2, Trustpilot, Reddit, Figma's own forum and pricing pages, NVD/SentinelOne security databases, and funding news.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. official
  5. official
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. security
  10. security
  11. security
  12. security
  13. official
  14. news
  15. review

Add this review to your site

This check for Figma says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.