Figma
Depends
Confidence: High
Buy it if you are a product or design team building user interfaces together every week . it is the category standard and the free tier is genuinely usable.
Comparison
Figma lands on Depends, and Balsamiq lands on Worth it.
Buy it if you are a product or design team building user interfaces together every week . it is the category standard and the free tier is genuinely usable.
Buy if you're a lean team that needs fast, low-fidelity wireframes with near-zero learning curve.
| Compare | Figma | Balsamiq |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Product and UX teams shipping software who design together daily | Lean product teams sketching UI ideas |
| Who it's not for | Solo freelancers or small teams that only need occasional simple mockups . a paid seat plan here is overkill; Penpot, Balsamiq, or even a template will do | Designers needing pixel-perfect, high-fidelity mockups |
| Privacy | Figma advertises SOC 2 Type 2, SSO, and a trust center, but 2025 was rough: Figma's own Data Processing Addendum discloses a security breach caused by a command injection, a command-injection CVE exists in Figma Desktop for Windows, and two RCE vulnerabilities were found in the third-party Framelink Figma MCP server that many teams connect to Figma.⁹ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Public sentiment | Aggregate sentiment is strongly positive on the core product . 4.6 stars on G2 with real-time collaboration as the standout strength and users saying it speeds up layout work significantly.² | Users consistently praise Balsamiq's speed, drag-and-drop simplicity, and low price. |
| Biggest gotcha | Seat-type sprawl is the big trap: full editor seats, Dev Mode seats, and cheap collaborator seats (around $5/month) mean your real cost depends on who touches files . model this before committing⁵ | No 24/7 support; email/web form during US business hours only |