shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use finder.com?

Finder compares leading financial products in investing, banking, lending, and more. Expert guides, tools and comparisons you can trust. - finder.com

Depends. Fine as a free starting point for comparing banking, loans, and investing products. Don't treat its rankings as impartial — it is affiliate-funded and was penalised by Australia's ACCC for misleading consumers, so verify offers with providers directly.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 10 public sources; snippets were brief, so some judgments are category-level.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Consumer access

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Consumers comparing banking, loans, and investing
  • Deal hunters chasing sign-up bonuses and rewards
  • Beginners wanting plain-English money guides
  • AU/US users checking credit via the Finder app

Not for

  • Anyone expecting neutral rankings — affiliate model favors partners
  • Shoppers wanting guaranteed 'best' deals; ACCC penalised Finder AU for misleading consumers
  • Complex or regulated financial decisions needing licensed advice
  • Businesses seeking procurement or SaaS tools — this is consumer content

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Affiliate-funded: providers pay for listings, so rankings can skew toward commercial partners — verify offers directly

medium

Signing up via Finder links may route you through tracking/referral arrangements you would not get going direct

medium

App promos like 'Earn 4%' sit behind waitlists with unclear terms

medium

Support is email/chat only; the 3.7/5 Trustpilot average suggests mixed experiences

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to use; it is an information service, not a paid product
  • Broad coverage across banking, investing, lending, and insurance
  • Runs rewards promotions, e.g. a $150 eToro bonus
  • Finder Score tool aims to speed up product comparisons
  • Companion app offers free credit score with Auth0-secured sign-in

Cons

  • Trustpilot averages just 3.7/5 for the US site
  • Australia's ACCC penalised.au for misleading consumers
  • Finder publishes 'general information and advice', not personalised advice
  • Reddit users ask 'any catch' about its free credit report

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x4security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free to users; providers pay, not you
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Guess: standard browse-and-compare site layout
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Guides, Finder Score, rewards, credit-score app
  • Support quality: 3/5. Email/chat only; 3.7/5 Trustpilot average
  • Security posture: 3/5. App identity via Auth0; no public security page
  • Free Cost to you Information service; funded via providers
  • 3.7/5 Trustpilot (US site) Average rating, www.finder.com
  • 826 reviews Reviews.io (AU site) finder.com.au company profile
  • Restuccia & Schebestma Founders Launched finder.com.au, per Crunchbase

Pricing

Consumer access

Free

  • Comparisons, guides, and Finder Score tools
  • Finder earns commissions from providers, not users
  • App credit-score features also free

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Reviews are mixed: the Australian site is popular with shoppers, but the US site averages 3.7/5 on Trustpilot and a past regulator penalty tempers trust.

“Finder.com.au is one of the mainly used websites.”
Featured testimonial, finder.com.au
“Finder's got this waitlist in their app saying "Earn 4”
Reddit, r/AusFinance
Full analysis

Based on 10 public sources; snippets were brief, so some judgments are category-level.

Free comparison site; useful first look, but affiliate-funded rankings and a 3.7 Trustpilot mean verify deals yourself.

Methodology

Based on 10 public sources; snippets were brief, so some judgments are category-level.

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. news
  4. review
  5. news
  6. security
  7. official
  8. official
  9. review
  10. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.