shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

FlowJo Review

Depends

Should I use FlowJo?

FlowJo, your flow cytometry data analysis software - flowjo.com

· 1 month ago

Buy if your lab analyzes flow cytometry data — it is the field's default and your collaborators likely already use it. Skip if you want cloud-native collaboration or transparent pricing; OMIQ or CellEngine fit better.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~30 public sources; no aggregate review ratings found, and no named commercial customers using competitors.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

~$221/yr academic per seat; commercial quote-only

User-based (BD Access Portal, formerly FlowJo Portal)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Group / site licensingQuote only
Dongle (legacy)Quote

Best for

  • Immunology and cancer research labs
  • Core facilities standardizing analysis
  • Gating-heavy cytometry workflows
  • Academic labs using core-facility licenses

Not for

  • Anyone not analyzing flow cytometry data
  • Teams wanting cloud-native, multi-user collaboration
  • Buyers demanding published, self-serve pricing
  • Labs unwilling to migrate off legacy dongles

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Licensing moved to BD Access Portal; sign-in and activation problems are common enough to warrant troubleshooting docs.

medium

Academic seats run ~$221/yr via cores; commercial pricing is quote-only — expect a sales call.

medium

Older purple dongles unsupported; legacy license holders face forced migration.

medium

Some longtime users stick to v10 after v11 frustration; pin your version carefully.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Category standard since 1997; gating mirrors immunologists' analysis logic.
  • Described as the premier platform for single-cell flow cytometry analysis.
  • Extensive training resources: FlowJo University, webinars, documentation.
  • Widely installed at major universities via core-facility site licenses.
  • Choice of user-based or dongle licensing.

Cons

  • v11 rollout drew strong user backlash online.
  • Users report bugs despite praising the UI.
  • Upgrade pricing requires calling sales; nothing published.
  • Legacy purple dongles no longer supported.
  • Sign-in licensing through BD Access Portal causes documented troubleshooting issues.

Sources & method

- 14 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x7review x5security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • ~$221/yr academic per seat; commercial quote-only

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Cheap per seat; upgrade pricing opaque.
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Praised UI, but v11 bugs frustrate.
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Deep gating and cell-cycle tools; category standard.
  • Support quality: 3/5. FlowJo University, docs, webinars; v11 friction reported.
  • Security posture: 3/5. No public vulns found; standard auth hardening.
  • 1997 Founded Acquired; now under Waters Biosciences branding
  • $221/yr Academic seat price Columbia core facility rate
  • v11 Latest version Revamped drag-and-drop workflow

Pricing

User-based (BD Access Portal, formerly FlowJo Portal)

~$221/yr academic per seat; commercial quote-only

  • Annual subscription
  • Per-user sign-in activation

Group / site licensing

Quote only

  • Annual subscription for labs and cores

Dongle (legacy)

Quote

  • Hardware license
  • Purple dongles unsupported

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Longtime users praise FlowJo's gating workflow and UI but widely complain that v11 is buggy and frustrating.

“FUCK flowjo.”
Reddit, r/flowcytometry
“FlowJo has great UI imo but is much buggier...”
Reddit, r/labrats
“I will die on this hill - FlowJo developers are among...”
Reddit, r/flowcytometry

Alternatives

Compare FlowJo with each alternative.

  • CellEngine

    Web-based tool some users report switching to.

Companies that use it

  • Harvard University
  • University of Michigan
  • UW–Madison Carbone Cancer Center
  • Columbia University (CSCI core)⁷
  • OHSU Flow Cytometry Core
Full analysis

Based on ~30 public sources; no aggregate review ratings found, and no named commercial customers using competitors.

Industry-standard cytometry analysis. Essential for flow labs; irrelevant to everyone else, and v11 angered longtime users.

Methodology

Based on ~30 public sources; no aggregate review ratings found, and no named commercial customers using competitors.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. official
  7. official
  8. official
  9. official
  10. official
  11. official
  12. security
  13. news
  14. official

Add this review to your site

This check for FlowJo says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.