shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use FlowPaper?

Flipbook Maker and Interactive Publications Platform - flowpaper.com

Depends. Buy it if you publish many PDFs — catalogs, reports, brochures — and want embeddable, accessible flipbooks in WordPress or the cloud. Skip it if you just need to share documents; a plain PDF link is free and simpler.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20+ public sources; snippets were truncated, so pricing specifics remain unverified.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support-quality evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • PDF-heavy publishers (catalogs, reports)
  • WordPress sites embedding flipbooks
  • Universities needing accessible PDFs
  • Marketing teams replacing print brochures

Not for

  • Anyone who just shares PDFs — plain links are free
  • One-off documents; flipbook conversion is wasted effort
  • Security-sensitive WordPress installs, given plugin CVE history
  • Buyers wanting transparent, independently verified pricing

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Cloud plans enforce search and usage quotas — confirm limits fit your traffic before paying

medium

WordPress plugin had stored XSS below v2.0.4 — update immediately if self-hosting

medium

Accessibility fit is debated among assistive-tech users; test with your own documents

low

Vendor's price comparisons are self-published; request independent quotes

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Reviewers consistently call it simple, quick and easy to use
  • Lets you own or self-host flipbooks, reducing vendor lock-in
  • Used for accessible PDF conversion at Loyola University Chicago
  • Real deployments at brands like Air New Zealand and Cornell
  • Flexible deployment: cloud, self-hosted, or WordPress plugin

Cons

  • Tiny independent review base — only 36 G2 reviews
  • WordPress plugin carries stored-XSS and input-validation CVE history
  • Cloud plans impose usage quotas, per its own docs
  • Pricing details sparse; competitor comparisons are self-published
  • Accessibility effectiveness questioned by users on Reddit

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/05/2026 - 13 sources - Known CVEs affect the Flowpaper WordPress plugin and Flexpaper viewer; vendor publishes a security page.

official x3review x5security x3news x2
  • CVE-2023-5200 — Stored XSS in flowpaper WordPress plugin, Contributor-level stored XSS in flowpaper-lite-pdf-flipbook below version 2.0.4.
  • CVE-2023-40197 — Input validation flaw in flowpaper 1.9.9, Input validation vulnerability reported in the WordPress plugin at version 1.9.9.
  • Flexpaper publish service code-execution advisories, CVE Details lists code-execution-class vulnerabilities for the Flowpaper/Flexpaper publish service.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Only self-published price comparisons; independently unverified
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Multiple reviewers call it simple, quick, easy
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Responsive flipbooks, accessibility support, WordPress plugin; niche scope
  • Support quality. No support-quality evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 2/5. Stored-XSS and input-validation CVEs in its plugin
  • 36 G2 reviews Small independent review base
  • Cloud or self-hosted Deployment Plus a WordPress plugin
  • Bootstrapped Funding Self-described profitable company

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Known CVEs affect the Flowpaper WordPress plugin and Flexpaper viewer; vendor publishes a security page.

  • CVE-2023-5200 — Stored XSS in flowpaper WordPress pluginContributor-level stored XSS in flowpaper-lite-pdf-flipbook below version 2.0.4.⁹
  • CVE-2023-40197 — Input validation flaw in flowpaper 1.9.9Input validation vulnerability reported in the WordPress plugin at version 1.9.9.10
  • Flexpaper publish service code-execution advisoriesCVE Details lists code-execution-class vulnerabilities for the Flowpaper/Flexpaper publish service.

What users say

Users find it simple and smooth for turning PDFs into flipbooks, though the independent review base is small.

“Simple, quick and easy.”
Capterra review
“FlowPaper is easy to use”
Capterra review

Alternatives

Compare FlowPaper with each alternative.

  • Publitas

    Retailer-focused digital catalog tool.

Companies that use it

  • Air New Zealand13
  • Cornell
  • Loyola University Chicago12
  • City & Guilds
  • American Hockey League
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources; snippets were truncated, so pricing specifics remain unverified.

Good flipbook tool for PDF-heavy publishers; overkill for simple PDF sharing, and its WordPress plugin has CVE history.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources; snippets were truncated, so pricing specifics remain unverified.

Sources

  1. FlowPaper Reviews — G2g2.com
    review
  2. FlowPaper — Capterracapterra.com
    review
  3. Flowpaper — Trustpilottrustpilot.com
    review
  4. Flowpaper? — Reddit r/accessibilityreddit.com
    review
  5. FlowPaper WordPress flipbook review — WP Globwpglob.com
    review
  6. FlowPaper official siteflowpaper.com
    official
  7. FlowPaper plans and pricesflowpaper.com
    official
  8. FlowPaper product security pageflowpaper.com
    official
  9. CVE-2023-5200 — WPScanwpscan.com
    security
  10. CVE-2023-40197 — Really Simple Securityreally-simple-ssl.com
    security
  11. Flowpaper — CVE Detailscvedetails.com
    security
  12. How Loyola uses FlowPaperluc.edu
    news
  13. Air New Zealand FlowPaper case studyyoutube.com
    news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.