shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use GitLab?

Skip to main content - gitlab.gnome.org

Depends. The pasted URL is GNOME's free community GitLab instance — if you're contributing to GNOME, it's free; there is nothing to buy. For your own org, GitLab is worth it only if you want self-hosted, all-in-one DevOps; small teams wanting simple code hosting should pick GitHub or Gitea instead.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; many snippets were truncated, so some figures should be verified at source pages.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityEvidence too thin to score
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
PremiumGuess: ~$29/user/mo
UltimateGuess: ~$99/user/mo

Best for

  • Enterprises wanting self-hosted DevOps
  • Teams consolidating repos + CI/CD + security
  • Compliance-heavy orgs
  • Open-source foundations like GNOME

Not for

  • Small teams that just need simple code hosting
  • Solo developers — GitHub is simpler and cheaper
  • Orgs with no admin staff for self-managed instances
  • Price-sensitive buyers facing per-seat hikes

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Per-user pricing keeps rising; hikes drove buyers to hunt alternatives

high

Self-managed means you patch it; critical CVEs need same-day upgrades

medium

Tier and usage-credit pricing confuse buyers; costs get unpredictable

medium

Leaving means migrating repos, CI configs, and history — plan for pain

Pros and cons

Pros

  • All-in-one: repos, CI/CD, and security testing in one platform
  • Huge adoption: 50M+ users, 106k+ companies tracked
  • Enterprise-proven at Barclays and Goldman Sachs
  • Built-in merge request review workflows
  • Open-source forge with self-hosted option for full control

Cons

  • UI widely called overwhelming and complex
  • Repeated license price increases push users to alternatives
  • Critical CVEs exploited shortly after disclosure
  • Code review process criticized by users
  • Self-hosted instances have been breached (Red Hat)

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/27/2026 - 11 sources - Frequent critical patch releases; multiple 2026 CVEs actively exploited; a Red Hat self-hosted instance was breached.

official x2review x4security x3news x2
  • CVE-2026-85706 — path traversal exploited in the wild, Critical GitLab path traversal vulnerability actively exploited; emergency patches followed.
  • CVE-2026-19478 — active exploitation, GitLab flaw reported as being exploited in the wild.
  • Critical unauthenticated GraphQL flaw, Flaw could let unauthenticated attackers in; disclosed August 2026.
  • Red Hat GitLab instance breach, Red Hat Consulting GitLab instance compromised; security update issued October 2025.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. Repeated price hikes and pricing confusion reported
  • Ease of use: 2/5. UI widely called overwhelming and complex
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Repos, CI/CD, security scanning all in one
  • Support quality. Evidence too thin to score
  • Security posture: 2/5. Actively exploited CVEs; self-hosted breach incidents
  • 50M+ Users claimed on GitLab homepage
  • 916 G2 reviews GitLab Inc. seller profile
  • Yes Free tier Free plan; self-managed community edition
  • $268M Series E Funding $2.7B+ valuation

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Repo hosting, CI/CD, basic reviews
  • Self-managed community edition

Premium

Guess: ~$29/user/mo

  • Advanced CI/CD, code analytics
  • Approval rules, enterprise support

Ultimate

Guess: ~$99/user/mo

  • SAST/DAST security testing
  • Compliance and portfolio management

Security

Frequent critical patch releases; multiple 2026 CVEs actively exploited; a Red Hat self-hosted instance was breached.

  • CVE-2026-85706 — path traversal exploited in the wildCritical GitLab path traversal vulnerability actively exploited; emergency patches followed.⁶
  • CVE-2026-19478 — active exploitationGitLab flaw reported as being exploited in the wild.
  • Critical unauthenticated GraphQL flawFlaw could let unauthenticated attackers in; disclosed August 2026.⁷
  • Red Hat GitLab instance breachRed Hat Consulting GitLab instance compromised; security update issued October 2025.⁸

What users say

Users value the integrated DevOps feature set but repeatedly complain about a complex, overwhelming UI and rising prices.

“It's UI can feel overwhe[lming]…”
Reddit, r/devops
“GitLab feels more 'compl[ex]'…”
Reddit, r/git

Companies that use it

  • Barclays PLC⁹
  • Goldman Sachs
  • Red Hat⁸
  • Aqua Security
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; many snippets were truncated, so some figures should be verified at source pages.

That URL is GNOME's free GitLab — nothing to buy. GitLab itself: powerful all-in-one DevOps, overkill for small teams.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; many snippets were truncated, so some figures should be verified at source pages.

Sources

  1. GitLab Pricingabout.gitlab.com
    official
  2. GitLab Reviews — G2g2.com
    review
  3. Am I the only one who thinks Gitlab is a horrible product?reddit.com
    review
  4. Looking for GitLab alternatives due to license price increasereddit.com
    review
  5. Please improve the code review process — GitLab Forumforum.gitlab.com
    review
  6. CVE-2026-85706: Critical GitLab Path Traversal Exploited in the Wild — Rapid7rapid7.com
    security
  7. Critical GitLab GraphQL Flaw — The Hacker Newsthehackernews.com
    security
  8. Red Hat GitLab instance incidentredhat.com
    security
  9. Barclays PLC customer case studyabout.gitlab.com
    official
  10. Companies that use GitLab — TheirStacktheirstack.com
    news
  11. GitLab — Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.