VERDICT
Knowledge graph of your team, automatically gleaned from interactions - histre.com
Depends. Low-confidence call: try it free if you're a solo user or small team losing tribal knowledge to scattered notes and bookmarks. Skip it if you need security documentation, admin controls, or independent proof it works at scale.
Low. Based on 14 public sources, mostly the vendor's own site; no independent reviews found.
$0
Free
medium
Paid tier prices absent from reviewed sources; 'simple and affordable' is unverified marketing.
medium
No security page found; hard to vet data handling before committing team knowledge.
medium
Guess: auto-gleaning from interactions may ingest noise or sensitive content; test scope on free tier.
Value for money: 4/5
Rating
$0
Starting price
5
Sources
Analyzed
$0
Not published in reviewed sources
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
The site's own testimonial praises automatic tribal-knowledge capture, but independent user reviews are scarce.
“I love that histre automatically keeps my company's tribal knowledge available to everyone. This has made scaling talent much easier.”
Compare histre with each alternative.
Flexible team wiki with bigger community and templates.
histre vs NotionLocal-first knowledge graph; your files stay yours.
histre vs ObsidianEnterprise wiki with documented security and admin controls.
Free web highlighting; reviewed sources show users capturing content there.
histre vs GlaspBased on 14 public sources, mostly the vendor's own site; no independent reviews found.
Auto-captures team knowledge with a free tier; fine for individuals, risky for teams needing security docs or proven adoption.
Based on 14 public sources, mostly the vendor's own site; no independent reviews found.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.